Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 147317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T08:45:37+00:00 2026-05-11T08:45:37+00:00

I’m assuming that the good old qsort function in stdlib is not stable, because

  • 0

I’m assuming that the good old qsort function in stdlib is not stable, because the man page doesn’t say anything about it. This is the function I’m talking about:

   #include <stdlib.h>    void qsort(void *base, size_t nmemb, size_t size,               int(*compar)(const void *, const void *));   

I assume that if I change my comparison function to also include the address of that which I’m comparing, it will be stable. Is that correct?

Eg:

int compareFoos( const void* pA, const void *pB ) {     Foo *pFooA = (Foo*) pA;     Foo *pFooB = (Foo*) pB;      if( pFooA->id < pFooB->id ) {         return -1;     } else if( pFooA->id > pFooB->id ) {         return 1;     } else if( pA < pB ) {         return -1;                 } else if( pB > pA ) {        return 1;     } else {        return 0;     } }    
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T08:45:38+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:45 am

    No, you cannot rely on that unfortunately. Let’s assume you have the array (two fields in each record used for checking but only first field used for sorting):

    B,1 B,2 A,3 

    A non-stable sort may compare B,1 with A,3 and swap them, giving:

    A,3 B,2 B,1 

    If the next step were to compare B,2 with B,1, the keys would be the same and, since B,2 has an address less than B,1, no swap will take place. For a stable sort, you should have ended up with:

    A,3 B,1 B,2 

    The only way to do it would be to attach the starting address of the pointer (not its current address) and sort using that as well as the other keys. That way, the original address becomes the minor part of the sort key so that B,1 will eventually end up before B,2 regardless of where the two B lines go during the sorting process.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 70k
  • Answers 70k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer WITH q AS ( SELECT c.*, p.id AS Unowned, ROW_NUMBER()… May 11, 2026 at 12:53 pm
  • added an answer You could also store reverse links and just check that… May 11, 2026 at 12:53 pm
  • added an answer The 4 in %04d sets the total width of the… May 11, 2026 at 12:53 pm

Related Questions

I keep getting tasks that are above my skill level. How can I address this without coming accross as grossly incompetent?
I have a web-service that I will be deploying to dev, staging and production.
I'm thinking of starting a wiki, probably on a low cost LAMP hosting account.
I have the following tables in my database that have a many-to-many relationship, which
I'm using the RESTful authentication Rails plugin for an app I'm developing. I'm having
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.