Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 808441
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:33:42+00:00 2026-05-15T00:33:42+00:00

I’m at Rails 2.3.5 and I have this problem: class BaseController < ApplicationController before_filter

  • 0

I’m at Rails 2.3.5 and I have this problem:

class BaseController < ApplicationController
  before_filter :foo, :only => [:index]
end

class ChildController < BaseController
  before_filter :foo, :only => [:index, :show, :other, :actions]
end

The problem is that on ChildController, the :foo before filter gets called twice.

I’ve tried a number of workarounds around this problem. If I don’t include the :index action in the child, it never gets called for that action.

The solution I found works, but I think it’s very very ugly

skip_before_filter :foo
before_filter :foo, :only => [:index, :show, :other, :actions]

Is there a better way to solve this problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:33:43+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:33 am

    “This behavior is by design”.

    The Rails guide on controllers states:

    “Filters are inherited, so if you set a filter on ApplicationController, it will be run on every controller in your application.”

    This explains the behaviour you’re seeing. It also suggests the exact same solution you propose (using skip_before_filter) to define which filters will or will not be run for a particular controller and/or methods.

    So, ugly or not, seems like the solution you found is common and approved practice.

    http://guides.rubyonrails.org/action_controller_overview.html#filters

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 480k
  • Answers 480k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Create a small function to extract just the date: def… May 16, 2026 at 6:00 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I had this as an interview question once. Here is… May 16, 2026 at 6:00 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think this ought to do it: sim(i,j) { item1… May 16, 2026 at 6:00 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.