I’m becoming extremely frustrated when people & companies don’t provide reliable documentation for their products.
According to this site: http://s3.amazonaws.com/doc/s3-developer-guide/RESTAuthentication.html
There is an algorithm that looks something like this:
import base64
import hmac
import sha
import urllib
h = hmac.new("OtxrzxIsfpFjA7SwPzILwy8Bw21TLhquhboDYROV",
"GET\n\n\n1141889120\n/quotes/nelson",
sha)
urllib.quote_plus(base64.encodestring(h.digest()).strip())
Which should produce a result of:
vjbyPxybdZaNmGa%2ByT272YEAiv4%3D
I’ve tried several variations, different charsets and different languages and I cannot produce this hash. I even downloaded some samples and when I use their signing algorithms they still don’t produce this hash. Here’s the C# code I have:
byte[] bytesToSign = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("GET\n\n\n1141889120\n/quotes/nelson");
byte[] secretKeyBytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("OtxrzxIsfpFjA7SwPzILwy8Bw21TLhquhboDYROV");
HMAC hmacSha256 = new HMACSHA256(secretKeyBytes);
byte[] hashBytes = hmacSha256.ComputeHash(bytesToSign);
string signature = Convert.ToBase64String(hashBytes);
But it produces a value of:
a5n2tpQTlqetX6Pjvv7vK23qi2JIZVlWZqIdteD2pok=
Yeah I can see that they’re wrapping it with a URL encoder but that wouldn’t change it this drastically. Does anyone have any idea what algorithm they may have used to produce this hash? I’m out of ideas.
Your C# code using the wrong HMAC hashing algorithm. From Amazon’s documentation:
As it says, you need to use SHA-1 instead of SHA-256: