Home/ Questions/Q 6592015
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-25T17:29:59+00:00

I’m building a single page application (e.g. like gmail) and I was wondering which

  • 0

I’m building a single page application (e.g. like gmail) and I was wondering which asp.net framework would be better?

asp.net mvc allows you full control and is easier with heavy ajax sites, but it isn’t very good when it comes to partial views (or userControls in webforms). My page is divided into different “regions” which behave very much on their own, so being able to separate them is very much an issue.

I know i can use PartialViews, but i’m not sure that MVC is in favor of them.

on the other hand there’s asp.net webforms which lends itself to userControls much easier, but is not as good when it comes to AJAX and heavy javaScript as much as MVC is. I’ve also seen people use webforms in an MVP kind of programming where everything is done in PageLoad and therefor has a lot of MVC’s benefits.

for a Single Page Application, which is more convenient?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    For rich single form applications I would start with ASP.NET MVC as there are fewer platform constraints to get in the way, and rendered HTML tends to be more lightweight than classic ASP.NET.

    You can design ASP.NET MVC applications in a highly modular fashion, as demonstrated by several MVC CMS’ such as Orchard, http://orchardproject.net/. These highly modular frameworks are based entirely on ASP.NET MVC. ASP.NET MVC 3 makes the whole process quite easy.

    Convenience can mean many things. From a “you the developer” convenience perspective (assuming that you will be the only one developing the application, and assuming that only you will require the modularity to plug your own regions into your application), it will be more convenient for you to develop with whatever framework you are more proficient with.

    • 0