Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9209355
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T00:49:24+00:00 2026-06-18T00:49:24+00:00

I’m building an AJAX app that makes heavy usage of tables displaying data. To

  • 0

I’m building an AJAX app that makes heavy usage of tables displaying data. To keep the design simple it’s nice to be able to tie table rows (DOM) to the data objects (JavaScript) and visa-versa. So, for example, if a row is clicked I know which data object goes with the row, or if a data object is deleted, I know easily which row to delete from the table. Years ago when I tried this, I ended up with lots of memory leaks. I understand IE8+ have resolved most of these. What about modern versions of Chrome, FireFox and Safari?

This is an example of the code, is this “safe” these days?

// Email class, holds info about each email displayed in a table
function Email()
{
   this.To = "";
   this.From = "";
   this.Row = null;
}

// This array would actually come from an AJAX web service call
var Emails = new Array();
Emails[0] = new Email();
Emails[0].To = "whatever";
Emails[0].From = "hello";
Emails[1] = new Email();
Emails[1].To = "whatever";
Emails[1].From = "hello";

// Code like this would be used to build initial table, after this rows would
//  be added deleted as updates arrive via AJAX calls    
var table = document.createElement("table");
for(var x=0;x<Emails.length();x++)
{
   var row = table.insertRow(-1);
   row.Email = Emails[x]; // Is this safe?
   Emails[x].Row = row; // ...and also this?
   var cell = row.insertCell(-1);
   cell.innerHTML = Emails[x].To;
   cell = row.insertCell(-1);
   cell.innerHTML = Emails[x].From;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T00:49:25+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 12:49 am

    It’s safe, in that sometime after your javascript and DOM elements go out of scope (your page goes away, the javascript objects go out of scope), the memory will eventually be cleaned up.

    However, I’d recommend against this. You’re basically creating a table in code, then associating those DOM elements with business objects. That’s mixing UI and logic.

    I’d instead suggest using KnockoutJS to let it handle all the DOM-to-JavaScript bindings for you. With KnockoutJS, I’d write your code like this:

    HTML:

    <table>
       <tbody data-bind="foreach: Emails">
          <tr>
            <td data-bind="html: To"></td>
            <td data-bind="html: From"></td>
          <tr>
       </tbody>
    </table>
    

    JavaScript:

    var viewModel = {
       Emails: ko.observableArray()
    };
    
    makeSome.AjaxCall(function(emailResults) {
        viewModel.Emails(emailResults);
    }
    
    ko.applyBindigns(viewModel);
    

    Now your UI stays in the DOM, and your logic stays in JavaScript.

    As an added bonus, the DOM will update whenever you add or remove emails to viewModel.Emails array. For example, merely calling viewModel.Emails.remove(someEmail) will automatically update the DOM for you; ditto for .push.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have a small JavaScript validation script that validates inputs based on Regex. I
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.