Home/ Questions/Q 7181325
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-28T17:32:01+00:00

I’m coding an application that requires remote binding, i.e., bind a remote object to

  • 0

I’m coding an application that requires remote binding, i.e., bind a remote object to a remote registry. By default, Java RMI Registry only binds locally, only remote objects that are binded in the same JVM/host.

I’ve seen some solutions that bypass this making a remote interface that will take a remote object and then bind locally (SO link of this disucssion). Isn’t there a more elegant way to solve this? Maybe I should try to use JNDI with other provider??

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I did some more research on this… First, if you have the same codebase on both servers, it should be as simple as this:

    ...
Registry registry = LocateRegistry.getRegistry("192.168.1.1", 1100);
registry.rebind("Hello, World!", myObj);

    But you can run into problems quickly if you need to load classes to the remote registry… you’ll need a security manager: http://www.devx.com/getHelpOn/10MinuteSolution/20444

    I was still hoping you could post a code example or give us more information about your situation.

    • 0