Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1000847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:34:38+00:00 2026-05-16T07:34:38+00:00

I’m combining these 3 tables into a report query with INNER JOINs (this is

  • 0

I’m combining these 3 tables into a report query with INNER JOINs (this is a simplified example):

USERS
ID    NAME    CODE1    CODE2
1     James   c1_2     c2_3
2     Bob     c1_3     c2_1

C1
CODE1     VALUE
c1_1      interested
c1_2      maybe
c1_3      not interested

C2
CODE1     VALUE
c2_1      prepared
c2_2      self-study
c2_3      novice

The query result looks like this:

NAME     INTEREST          PREPARED
James    maybe             novice
Bob      not interested    prepared

I would like to get rid of the lookup tables and create this query result using only the USERS table and probably some clever REPLACE() statement. Can it be done?

Thank you!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:34:39+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:34 am

    Sure but I don’t see the point.

    SELECT  u.Name, c1.Value, c2.Value
    FROM    dbo.Users u
            INNER JOIN (
              SELECT 'c1_1' as Code1, 'interested' as Value
              UNION ALL SELECT 'c1_2', 'maybe'
              UNION ALL SELECT 'c1_3', 'not interested'
            ) c1 ON c1.Code1 = u.Code1
            INNER JOIN (
              SELECT 'c2_1' as Code1, 'prepared' as Value
              UNION ALL SELECT 'c2_2', 'self-study'
              UNION ALL SELECT 'c2_3', 'novice'
            ) c2 ON c2.Code1 = u.Code2
    

    ps. I know this is (most likely) not what you mean but my guestimate is that it will always outperform any REPLACE solution and is more flexible.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.