Home/ Questions/Q 650105
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-13T22:01:00+00:00

I’m creating a game in XNA and was thinking of creating my own scripting

  • 0

I’m creating a game in XNA and was thinking of creating my own scripting language (extremely simple mind you). I know there’s better ways to go about this (and that I’m reinventing the wheel), but I want the learning experience more than to be productive and fast.

When confronted with code at run time, from what I understand, the usual approach is to parse into a machine code or byte code or something else that is actually executable and then execute that, right? But, for instance, when Chrome first came out they said their JavaScript engine was fast because it compiles the JavaScript into machine code. This implies other engines weren’t compiling into machine code.

I’d prefer not compiling to a lower language, so are there any known modern techniques for parsing and executing code without compiling to low level? Perhaps something like parsing the code into some sort of tree, branching through the tree, and comparing each symbol and calling some function that handles that symbol? (Wild guessing and stabbing in the dark)

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I personally wouldn’t roll your own parser ( turning the input into tokens ) or lexer ( checking the input tokens for your language grammar ). Take a look at ANTLR for parsing/lexing – it’s a great framework and has full source code if you want to dig into the guts of it.

    For executing code that you’ve parsed, I’d look at running a simple virtual machine or even better look at llvm which is an open-source(ish) attempt to standardise the virtual machine byte code format and provide nice features like JITing ( turning your script compiled byte code into assembly ).

    I wouldn’t discourage you from the more advanced options that you machine such as native machine code execution but bear in mind that this is a very specialist area and gets real complex, real fast!

    Earlz pointed out that my reply might seem to imply ‘don’t bother doing this yourself. Re-reading my post it does sound a bit that way. The reason I mentioned ANTLR and LLVM is they both have heaps of source code and tutorials so I feel this is a good reference source. Take it as a base and play

    • 0