Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4549700
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T16:23:47+00:00 2026-05-21T16:23:47+00:00

I’m curious about the current trend these days for ajax-applications. Is it acceptable to

  • 0

I’m curious about the current trend these days for ajax-applications. Is it acceptable to simply build an ajax application the best you can make it and simply ignore browsers that don’t support ajax (assuming this a secured part of the site… not the public part)?

I am not talking about corporate intranets where you can reasonably control the browsers being used – but sites that people pay a monthly rate for. It’s not quite public, but it’s not controlled either.

It seems that the more you make your ajax application “kick ass”, the harder it is to support the old model of doing things. The two models diverge further and further apart from each other that you’re basically writing 2 UIs/controllers for everything in your system. Maybe in some cases you are writing 2 views too.

I’m the only developer working on this particular project. Having to double my efforts actually seems like a waste of time. I think I am better off building the product I want, and if it’s successful, maybe go back and add the non-ajax stuff later (if at all).

The project’s unique selling point – it’s core domain – has a lot to do with the way I’m going to incorporate ajax. Frankly, supporting the non-ajax stuff isn’t really that important to me. The software that doesn’t support ajax is basically going to be a copy of what people are already using. The reason people would use this software is because it’s a lot easier to use and it’s lot more fun to use.

If people want the non-ajax version, there’s already a lot of products out there that do that. I’m thinking it’s smart to just say “screw it… that’s a market I’m just going to ignore… and I’m going to bank on the fact that my product might eventually overtake them anyway.”

Given this scenario, would it be reasonable to simply not support browsers with javascript disabled? If I did that, what things would I need to worry about, besides customers using older browsers and having problems?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T16:23:48+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 4:23 pm

    If you can safely assume all of your users have JavaScript enabled or are able (and willing) to enable it for your site, you can require JavaScript.

    However, you should still provide a meaningful, well-looking error page for those who do not have JavaScript. You could even add a guide how to enable (or allow – e.g. via NoScript) JavaScript for the site.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I don't have much knowledge about the IPv6 protocol, so sorry if the question
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.