Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7993543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T13:52:52+00:00 2026-06-04T13:52:52+00:00

I’m currently developing a C# MVC REST web api, and am trying to choose

  • 0

I’m currently developing a C# MVC REST web api, and am trying to choose between one of two possibilities for our design.

Without getting too deep into our design, we intend to have a class for data access, which we’ll call DataSource. Each DataSource will need to execute small, contained blocks of logic to correctly build an appropriate response. Due to a desire to be able to hot-load code in the future, we don’t want to simply have these be functions on DataSource, instead we’d like them to be provided by other assemblies. We have a proof of concept of this implemented, and so far, so good.

What I’m trying to decide between is writing a static class with a single static ExecuteQuery function, or writing a factory method to create instances of these classes, which have an instance method called ExecuteQuery.

What are the performance considerations between creating multiple, short-lived objects every request, vs calling static methods?

Intuitively, static methods would be faster, but I’m already expecting that I’ll run into a bit of a headache calling them through reflection (to support the hot-loaded code requirement).

If there’s not a huge penalty for short-lived objects, then they might win out on simplicity alone.

Relevant information about our expect loads:

  • Response times in the 300ms – 800ms range
  • Average load of about 2000 web clients
  • Peak load of about 4000 clients
  • Clients doing queries every 2 – 5 seconds
  • Client peak rate of 1 query every second

Also, each DataSource would create a maximum of 8, average of 3 of these instances.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T13:52:54+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 1:52 pm

    Use a static class, that delegates the calls to the implementation classes.

    These implementation classes should implement a common interface, which will allow you to call methods on them without needing reflection. And of course, static methods can’t implement interface methods. Interface implementations have to be instances, you need some kind of factory to instantiate them. If they live in external assemblies, I strongly suggest you take a look at the Managed Extensibility Framework (MEF), see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd460648.aspx.

    What are the performance considerations between creating multiple, short-lived objects every request, vs calling static methods? Given that these methods will do data access, the performance implications are totally completely and utterly negligable.

    If you use MEF, the framework will create singleton-like instances for you.

    If you role your own, and want to remove the need to create these objects multiple times, you can implement the Singleton pattern on them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.