Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8627641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T08:19:53+00:00 2026-06-12T08:19:53+00:00

I’m currently facing an issue with base and subclasses. While having a single object

  • 0

I’m currently facing an issue with base and subclasses.

While having a single object as parameter (method single) the compiler doesn’t complain.

But if it comes to lists the compiler forces me to declare the list as <? extends Base>

After that I’m no longer allowed to add objects of the base type to that list.

How can I use both types (Base and Subclass) in one list?

public class Generics {

    class Base {    }

    class Sub extends Base{     }

    interface I {
        public void list( List<Sub> list );
        public void single( Sub p);
    }

    class C implements I {
        public void list( List<Sub> list) {     }
        public void single( Sub p) {        }
    }

    void test() {
        C c = new C();
        c.single( new Sub() );
        c.list( new ArrayList<Base>() ); // The method list(List<Generics.Sub>) in the type Generics.C is not applicable for the arguments (ArrayList<Generics.Base>)

    }

    public static void main( String[] args) {
        Generics g = new Generics();
        g.test();
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T08:19:54+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 8:19 am

    Change:

    public void list(List<Sub> list);
    

    to:

    public void list(List<? extends Base> list);
    

    Using just List<Base> will give you compiler errors like this one:

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Sub> subs = new ArrayList<Sub>();
        doSomethingWith(subs); // The method doSomethingWith(List<Base>) in the type Main is not applicable for the arguments (List<Sub>)
    }
    
    private static void doSomethingWith(List<Base> bases) {
        // Do something with bases
    }
    

    If all you’re going to pass is List<Base> to doSomethingWith, then this point is moot, since this won’t give you a compiler error. If you want to pass lists that are of a specific type (such as List<Sub> above), then you need to change doSomethingWith to:

    private static void doSomethingWith(List<? extends Base> bases) {
    

    This fixes the problem. You could also do it at the caller lever (but it’s a bit messier):

        List<Sub> subs = new ArrayList<Sub>();
        doSomethingWith(new ArrayList<Base>(subs));
    

    One issue with the wildcard (?) approach is that you can’t add new items to the list. To do that, you need something like:

    private static <B extends Base> void doSomethingWith(List<B> bases) {
    

    And then add only B instances to bases.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka
I'm having trouble keeping the paragraph square between the quote marks. In firefox the
I'm trying to create an if statement in PHP that prevents a single post

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.