Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 803837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:49:22+00:00 2026-05-14T23:49:22+00:00

I’m currently in a situation where we are creating a facade database which basically

  • 0

I’m currently in a situation where we are creating a “facade” database which basically consists of a set of views which are simply a select from an identically named table in another database. The idea is that the application can be repointed to the facade database with minimal changes to the actual code.

This seems to work ok for inserts, update, deletes, and obviously selects. Unfortunately, some of the stored procedures use TRUNCATE TABLE in places. It’s very limited and our plan right now is to just replace that code with a call to a “TRUNCATE” stored procedure which will actually handle the table truncation behind the scenes. Before going forward with that though, I wanted to see if there were any other suggestions on how to handle this.

Thanks for any suggestions or advice!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:49:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:49 pm

    Your approach (using special stored procedures) is the only way the do it because TRUNCATE TABLE (Transact-SQL) only works on tables, not views. I guess you have a specific reason (faster and uses fewer system and transaction log resources) to use TRUNCATE over DELETE, since you have the DELETEs working on the views. You might be able to do something with a DELETE trigger, and detect if all rows are being removed use a truncate. I think you approach with a stored procedure is the cleanest way to go.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 393k
  • Answers 393k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's cleaner. To use a single executable for the Rails… May 15, 2026 at 1:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It seems you cross-posted this on the tornado mailing list… May 15, 2026 at 1:59 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute"> <mx:Script> <![CDATA[ public function… May 15, 2026 at 1:59 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.