Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3402858
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T05:11:22+00:00 2026-05-18T05:11:22+00:00

I’m currently investigating a windows crash dump and the Visual Studio debugger shows me

  • 0

I’m currently investigating a windows crash dump and the Visual Studio debugger shows me an “illegal instruction 0xC000001D” when opening the dump file. The code position it shows this error shows a disassembly along the following example:

 void g(int x) {
 00401E80  push        ebp  
 00401E81  mov         ebp,esp 
    if(x > 20) {
 00401E83  cmp         dword ptr [x],14h 
 00401E87  jle         g+14h (401E94h) 
        x *= 4;
>00401E89  db          0fh  // illegal instruction here
 00401E8A  db          0fh  
 00401E8B  xadd        eax,esp 
 00401E8E  add         cl,byte ptr [ecx+9EB0845h] 
        x += 42;
 00401E94  mov         ecx,dword ptr [x]
 ...

I manually created the above example in the debugger by overwriting the function code with some invalid values in the debuggers memory window, but the crash dump I am investigation shows the same db 0fh entry, apparently indicating an invalid instruction. The code is also similar to what my dump file displays in that the instructions prior to the invalid instruction all seem valid and matching the source code.

Now the question is is it possible at all in a normally compiled C++ program – that does not mess around with memory page access restrictions – (Visual C++ 2005 on Windows XP) to mess up the code segment of the process?

If I try to write to the function address in my example above from code, I always get an Access Violation, that is the code segment memory page appears to be write protected.

{
    void* fnAddr = &g; // non-portable but OK in VC++
    unsigned int x = 0xDEADBEEF;
    // Simulate memory corruption: Try to write something to the code segment:
    memcpy((char*)fnAddr+4, &x, sizeof(x)); // generated 0xC0000005 Access Violation
    g(42); // call messed up function - never get here
}

Do you know of any situation where it would in fact be possible to inadvertently overwrite something in the code segment?

I should add that the real program is lots more complicated, with lots of virtual functions, some member function pointers, etc. etc. and the problem is sadly not reproducible, we only currently have this one dump file that looks fine otherwise. — Still, the dump file displays an illegal instruction in the code segment and I would not have thought it possible to mess up the code segment.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T05:11:22+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 5:11 am

    No, the memory pages that contain code are write protected. This kind of damage could only occur at process initialization time. But the more likely source is soft RAM errors. Ask your customer to run a RAM test program. Consider file damage is the error is repeatable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
In my XML file chapters tag has more chapter tag.i need to display chapters
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains
i want to parse a xhtml file and display in UITableView. what is the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.