Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1056457
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T17:43:04+00:00 2026-05-16T17:43:04+00:00

I’m currently learning how to write CL style macros (define-macro) in Scheme. As a

  • 0

I’m currently learning how to write CL style macros (define-macro) in Scheme. As a simple example, I wrote a struct macro that defines functions like make-thing, thing?, thing-field accessors and so on.

Now I’d like to combine multiple defines in a single macro, but only the last one is actually used. Currently I’m using eval to define the functions globally (?), but there must be some better way… any ideas?

The code so far:

;(use-modules (ice-9 pretty-print))

(define-macro (struct name key table fields)
  (for-each
    (lambda (field)
      (eval
        `(define ,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "-" (symbol->string field)))
          (lambda (x)
            (if (,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "?")) x)
              (cadr (assq (quote ,field) (cdr x)))
              #f)))
        (interaction-environment)))
      fields)
  (eval
    `(define ,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "?"))
       (lambda (x)
         (and
           (list? x)
           (eq? (car x) (quote ,name))
           ,@(map (lambda (field) `(assq (quote ,field) (cdr x))) fields)
           #t)))
    (interaction-environment))
  (eval
    `(define ,(string->symbol (string-append "make-" (symbol->string name)))
       (lambda ,fields
         (list (quote ,name)
               ,@(map (lambda (field) `(list (quote ,field) ,field)) fields))))
    (interaction-environment))
  (eval
    `(define ,(string->symbol (string-append "save-" (symbol->string name)))
       (lambda (x)
         (if (,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "?")) x)
           (call-with-output-file ; TODO: In PLT mit zusaetzlichem Parameter #:exists 'replace
             (string-append "data/" ,(symbol->string table) "/"
                            (,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "-" (symbol->string key))) x))
             (lambda (out) (write x out)))
           #f)))
    (interaction-environment))
  `(define ,(string->symbol (string-append "get-" (symbol->string name)))
     (lambda (id)
       (let ((ret (call-with-input-file (string-append "data/" ,(symbol->string table) "/" id) read)))
         (if (,(string->symbol (string-append (symbol->string name) "?")) ret)
           ret
           #f))))
; TODO: (define (list-customers . search-words) ...)
  )

(struct customer id customers (id name name_invoice address_invoice zip_invoice city_invoice state_invoice))
;(pretty-print (macroexpand '(struct customer id customers (id name name_invoice address_invoice zip_invoice city_invoice state_invoice))))
;(newline)

(define c (make-customer "C-1001" "Doe, John" "John Doe" "Some-Street" "Some-Zip" "Some-City" "Germany"))
(write c)
(newline)
(write (customer-id c))
(newline)
(write (customer-name c))
(newline)
(save-customer c)
(write (get-customer "C-1001"))
(newline)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T17:43:05+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:43 pm

    You don’t need eval here; use begin instead to group those definitions together into a list; i.e., the template to be expanded should be of the form:

    `(begin 
       ,@(map ...)
       (define ...)
       (define ...)
       ...)
    

    Edit:

    Change for-each to map as suggested by OP.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.