Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6948797
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T13:52:13+00:00 2026-05-27T13:52:13+00:00

I’m currently redesigning a site and considering whether or not too use .load for

  • 0

I’m currently redesigning a site and considering whether or not too use .load for most navigation to make it faster for the user and just nicer to use.

To do this I have links with <a href="/the/link" id="linkId">link</a>

I then use $("#main").on("click", "linkId" with return false so that the links aren’t followed.

I have /load/page.php and /page.php to supply either the load code needed or the full page version if a user is going straight to it.

Lastly on all load page changes I update the page hash using document.location.hash = "/" + $(this).attr("href");

This means urls of the site would look like the following to the users:

domain.com/#/file/page

and this to the search engines:

domain.com/file/page

If a user types in the hashed url they are redirected with the following code to the actual search engine url so I think I have everything covered?

if (location.href.indexOf("#") > -1) {
    location.assign(location.href.replace(/\/?#/, ""));
}

I’d block the hashed urls from being indexed and only allow the proper urls to be reached, I was then thinking if people linked to the hashed url would you need to do a page moved for seo?

Are there any massive disadvantages to this approach and/or are there better ways to go about it when trying to create fully dynamic sites?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T13:52:14+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:52 pm

    First of all, I wouldn’t use two versions of php dispatcher. Instead, check if request is ajax, if so – serve the content only (otherwise, serve the full html – this should make the web crawlers still see the html version).

    secondly, instead of providing different hrefs, use sth like this:

    $(function(){
      $('a').click(function(){
          // load content of $(this).attr('href')
          // & change the hash
          return false;
      });
    });
    

    this will keep the site seo friendly (and also user-without-js – friendly 😉 )

    Have a look at http://tkyk.github.com/jquery-history-plugin/

    // — added 18:45Z

    if, for some reason, modifying the dispatcher is too complex or impossible, you might want to consider using jQuery’s load filtering ability (see jQuery load docs), however that method produces unnecessary overhead and it’s better to avoid it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.