Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7443219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T11:17:52+00:00 2026-05-29T11:17:52+00:00

I’m currently working on a web app, and have been inspired by a couple

  • 0

I’m currently working on a web app, and have been inspired by a couple different apps out there (mainly Cloud9IDE) in how they hold a large majority of their interface in javascript objects. This makes it incredibly easy to add features in the future, and also allows extensibility options in the future.

The question is, at what point does storing data in memory (via javascript) become rude. I’m building a social network (think like Twitter), and essentially I would be storing an object for every “tweet”, as well as some more broad objects for interface items.

Are there hard limits forced by browsers on how much memory I can use? Will my website crash if I go over? Or will the entire browser crash? Will it slow down the user? If so, is there a general rule for how much memory will bother the average user?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T11:17:53+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 11:17 am

    Absolutely positively don’t use anywhere close to 4 GB of memory. Most people use 32-bit browsers, so the browser couldn’t support 4 GB anyway 🙂

    On a more practical note, remember that the more memory you take up, the slower your app will usually run. Today’s Intel/AMD (I don’t know about ARM) processors access registers about 100 times faster than accessing memory that isn’t in cache, so if you use a lot of memory you will cause thrashing, which will slow down your application dramatically.

    So, assuming that you want users for your social network, you should try to design your website to work well on as many machines as possible. Millions and millions of people are still using Windows XP machines that are 5+ years old. These machines might have as little as 512 MB of RAM, so if you are using a few hundred megabytes, you can thrash all of memory rather than just processor cache, as the kernel keeps swapping out pages that you want to use. So as a rule of thumb I would recommend staying below 150-200 MB of memory. GMail takes up ~100MB of memory on Chrome for Linux, so I think that keeping up with GMail is a reasonable goal.

    Another benefit of keeping memory usage relatively low is that your users can more easily view your site on a smartphone. An iPhone 3GS (there are still a lot of them in use) has only 256 MB of RAM, so staying below 200 MB in your website makes it easier for a smartphone user to load your site without having to kill processes indiscriminately.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.