Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1091393
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:31:14+00:00 2026-05-16T23:31:14+00:00

I’m currently writing a little GUI program that does some work and exits afterwards.

  • 0

I’m currently writing a little GUI program that does some work and exits afterwards. While work is done, the GUI thread is updated with infos for the user.

This is the pattern I’m currently using and I’m thinking it’s not the most elegant one:

static void MainForm_Loaded(BeoExport exporter)
{
    // Thread 1 runs the Export
    workerThread = new Thread(() =>
    {
        exporter.StartExport();
        // don't exit immediately, so the user sees someting if the work is done fast
        Thread.Sleep(1000);     
    });

    // Thread 2 waits for Thread 1 and exits the program afterwards
    waiterThread = new Thread(() =>
    {
        workerThread.Join();
        Application.Exit();
    });

    workerThread.Start();
    waiterThread.Start();
}

So what pattern/mechanics would you use to do the same?

To clarify: I was not interested in a way to update the GUI thread. That’s already done. This might sound esoteric but I was lookig for the right way to quit the application.

If I could, I would give Dave the credits, since he pointed out the usefulness of the BackgroundWorker.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:31:14+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:31 pm

    Have you considered a BackgroundWorker thread instead? You can use its ReportProgress method and ProgressChanged event to update the GUI (with a progress bar perhaps), assuming that you can refactor BeoExport.StartExport method to also report progress. This gives the users visible feedback that work is actually happening.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.