Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8780341
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T20:01:08+00:00 2026-06-13T20:01:08+00:00

I’m currently writing a wrapper object for a series of database result sets. In

  • 0

I’m currently writing a wrapper object for a series of database result sets. In so doing, I’ve noticed a problem when querying with LINQ and Lambda expressions. Specifically, calling a method within the lambda seems to always make the result set empty and never actually fires the method I’m attempting to filter with. Here’s the code:

' Query and filter container results 
Public Function [Filter](pFilter As IFilter(Of T)) As System.Linq.IQueryable(Of T)
    ' THIS YIELDS AN EMPTY SET EVEN WHEN pFilter.Test(o) ALWAYS RETURNS TRUE
    Dim lResult As System.Linq.IQueryable(Of T) = mTable.Where(Function(o As T) pFilter.Test(o))

    Return lResult
End Function

pFilter implements IFilter with this signature:

Public Interface IFilter(Of T)
    Function Test(ByVal pObject As T) As Boolean
End Interface

I’ve break pointed pFilter.Test(o) and found it is never actually called. Oddly enough, if I replace pFilter.Test(o) with True, I receive the entire table of records as expected. Also, I receive no compile time or run time errors in any case.

I’m pretty new to Lambdas and LINQ so fully recognize I may not understand the limits of what I am attempting to accomplish. Any help is greatly appreciated!

SOLUTION:
I’ve marked a solution already as the author got me on the right track. The true nature of this problem stems from my attempting to force a .NET function into something LINQ could turn into an SQL statement (which is impossible). To solve this, I’ve changed my IFilter to return System.Linq.Expressions.Expression(Of Func(Of T, Boolean)) for the Test method. Now I can create strongly-typed filters which return predicates and pass them directly to Where() without the use of a lambda expression. I’m also using LinqKit to make this work more easily for those who may be accomplishing similar tasks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T20:01:09+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 8:01 pm

    I think I found what your issue is – understanding the concept of IQueryable. Here is what it says in this article: Lazy Loading With The LazyList

    IQueryable is the cornerstone of Linq To Sql, and has (what I think)
    is a killer feature: delayed execution. IQueryable essentially creates
    an Expression for you that you can treat as an enumerable list – and
    only when you iterate or ask for a value will the query be executed.

    So you probably never used the result, and that’s why it was never called. .NET framework only built the expression tree for you, but did not do any processing.

    See also: IQueryable vs. IEnumerable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Let's say I'm outputting a post title and in our database, it's Hello Y’all
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I've tracked down a weird MySQL problem to the two different ways I was
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string
I have a view passing on information from a database: def serve_article(request, id): served_article

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.