I’m developing a git post-receive hook in Python. Data is supplied on stdin with lines similar to
ef4d4037f8568e386629457d4d960915a85da2ae 61a4033ccf9159ae69f951f709d9c987d3c9f580 refs/heads/master
The first hash is the old-ref, the second the new-ref and the third column is the reference being updated.
I want to split this into 3 variables, whilst also validating input. How do I validate the branch name?
I am currently using the following regular expression
^([0-9a-f]{40}) ([0-9a-f]{40}) refs/heads/([0-9a-zA-Z]+)$
This doesn’t accept all possible branch names, as set out by man git-check-ref-format. For example, it excludes a branch by the name of build-master, which is valid.
Bonus marks
I actually want to exclude any branch that starts with “build-“. Can this be done in the same regex?
Tests
Given the great answers below, I wrote some tests, which can be found at
https://github.com/alexchamberlain/githooks/blob/master/miscellaneous/git-branch-re-test.py.
Status: All the regexes below are failing to compile. This could indicate there’s a problem with my script or incompatible syntaxes.
Let’s dissect the various rules and build regex parts from them:
They can include slash
/for hierarchical (directory) grouping, but no slash-separated component can begin with a dot.or end with the sequence.lock.They must contain at least one
/. This enforces the presence of a category like heads/, tags/ etc. but the actual names are not restricted. If the--allow-oneleveloption is used, this rule is waived.They cannot have two consecutive dots
..anywhere.They cannot have ASCII control characters (i.e. bytes whose values are lower than
\040, or\177 DEL), space, tilde~, caret^, or colon:anywhere.They cannot have question-mark
?, asterisk*, or open bracket[anywhere. See the--refspec-patternoption below for an exception to this rule.They cannot begin or end with a slash
/or contain multiple consecutive slashes (see the--normalizeoption below for an exception to this rule)They cannot end with a dot
..They cannot contain a sequence
@{.They cannot contain a
\.Piecing it all together we arrive at the following monstrosity:
And if you want to exclude those that start with
build-then just add another lookahead:This can be optimized a bit as well by conflating a few things that look for common patterns: