Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1073911
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T21:03:05+00:00 2026-05-16T21:03:05+00:00

I’m developing a library which the other programmer will import and use it for

  • 0

I’m developing a library which the other programmer will import and use it for their purposes.

I’m confused about the objective of Java access modifier.

The problem is that I have classes below

  • ClassA in package org.mylibrary
  • ClassB in package org.mylibrary.internal

ClassA needs to resolve ClassB so ClassB need to be public class.

However, from library user view, I don’t intend ClassB to be visible outside my library. Because it shouldn’t be and don’t need to be initiated by the user.

I think of moving ClassB to package org.mylibrary and make it package-private class.

If I move it to the same package, it would be a mess and difficult to organize because I have many classes in this scenario so there will be many .java files in a big one package.

Normally I put the classes in packages grouped by category or layer and I think it’s easy to organize.

How do I do this? How do people handle this problem?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T21:03:06+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:03 pm

    It is difficult to give concrete advice since you give so little info about the roles of and relationship between ClassA and ClassB. However, one general solution (which is almost always used as part of eliminating dependencies) is to hide ClassB behind an interface. Then ClassA uses only that interface, so it is not anymore directly dependent on ClassB. ClassB can be made package private, its instances produced by e.g. a factory, or dependency injected into ClassA.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.