Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7445859
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T12:08:36+00:00 2026-05-29T12:08:36+00:00

I’m developing an application with node.js and socket.io. I have built a small-scale project

  • 0

I’m developing an application with node.js and socket.io. I have built a small-scale project with some variables and functions inside a connection-specific block. These functions have access to the variables declared within that block without the need to pass the values in specifically.

This works fine, and is acceptable for a project of this size. However, as I was trying to clean the code up a bit, I looked into factoring those functions out into their own file and found modules declared by using exports.functionname as described here: http://nodejs.org/docs/v0.3.2/api/modules.html

However, these functions do not have access to the variables within the same block as they normally do when being require()’d in instead of actually being declared in the file.

Is there some way to make functions in an external file behave as if they were declared locally in nodejs?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T12:08:40+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 12:08 pm

    There isn’t without hacking the module system, which is exactly what I did. https://github.com/Benvie/Node.js-Ultra-REPL/blob/master/lib/ScopedModule.js

    I can’t say I recommend it for production. Basically the issue is more with JavaScript itself. Node wraps modules in a function so they have their own private scope. The only way to share in that scope is to be executed inside that function which wouldn’t really work for a module (modular…) system. The only other scope is global which also isn’t desirable.

    The trick I used to get around it is in changing that wrapper function to have dynamic properties based on an externally defined set of module imports so that from inside the module wrapper all those parameters look like they’re magically defined but aren’t global.

    Node’s module wrapper looks like this:

    (function (exports, module, require, __filename, __dirname){
      /**module**/
    })
    

    Where mine simply adds more parameters and ensures they’re resolved before executing the module wrapper.

    I have it read a file named “.deps.json” in a given folder before loading a module.
    An example one would be like this

    [{
        "providers": [ "./utility/",
                       "./settings/" ],
        "receivers": [ "*" ]
    }]
    

    So it will load the modules in those subfolders and then expose each one as a parameter in the wrapper, named based on the filename.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I used javascript for loading a picture on my website depending on which small
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.