Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 636951
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:34:14+00:00 2026-05-13T20:34:14+00:00

I’m generally unsatisfied with writing code like this: let load_record_field cursor gets geti gett

  • 0

I’m generally unsatisfied with writing code like this:

let load_record_field cursor gets geti gett a = function
  | 0x01 -> let c, s = gets () in (a.a_record_uuid <- s; `More_record c)
  | 0x02 -> let c, s = gets () in (a.a_group <- s; `More_record c)
  | 0x03 -> let c, s = gets () in (a.a_title <- s; `More_record c)
  | 0x04 -> let c, s = gets () in (a.a_username <- s; `More_record c)
  | 0x07 -> let c, t = gett () in (a.a_creation_time <- t; `More_record c)
  .
  .
  .
  | 0xFF -> `End_of_record cursor

I’ve minimized the boilerplate, but I was wondering if there was any OCaml magic that would let me completely eliminate it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:34:15+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:34 pm

    This is dead simple: just use a closure to do the setting, and write a function to abstract out the boilerplate

    let load_record_field cursor gets geti gett a x =
      let frob get set =
         let (c,s) = get () in
         set s; `More_record c
      in
      function
      | 0x01 -> frob gets (fun s -> a.a_record_uuid <- s)
      | 0x02 -> frob gets (fun s -> a.a_group <- s)
      | 0x03 -> frob gett (fun s -> a.a_title <- s)
      ...
    

    and so on.

    You can make this even better if you use a macro package like Jane
    Street’s fieldslib. That generates first-class fields, along with
    automatically generated setters and getters. This would mean that you
    wouldn’t have to construct the closure each time by hand.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 449k
  • Answers 449k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Unless you're explicitly converting to a str, it's the __repr__… May 15, 2026 at 8:13 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not much of an MVC programmer, but surely you… May 15, 2026 at 8:13 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to explicitly state the width and height in… May 15, 2026 at 8:13 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.