Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 515711
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:39:22+00:00 2026-05-13T07:39:22+00:00

I’m getting a compile error (MS VS 2008) that I just don’t understand. After

  • 0

I’m getting a compile error (MS VS 2008) that I just don’t understand. After messing with it for many hours, it’s all blurry and I feel like there’s something very obvious (and very stupid) that I’m missing. Here’s the essential code:

typedef int (C::*PFN)(int);

struct MAP_ENTRY
    {
    int id;
    PFN pfn;
    };

class C
    {
    ...
    int Dispatch(int, int);
    MAP_ENTRY *pMap;
    ...
    };

int C::Dispatch(int id, int val)
    {
    for (MAP_ENTRY *p = pMap; p->id != 0; ++p)
        {
        if (p->id == id)
            return p->pfn(val);  // <--- error here
        }
    return 0;
    }

The compiler claims at the arrow that the “term does not evaluate to a function taking 1 argument”. Why not? PFN is prototyped as a function taking one argument, and MAP_ENTRY.pfn is a PFN. What am I missing here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:39:22+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:39 am

    p->pfn is a pointer of pointer-to-member-function type. In order to call a function through such a pointer you need to use either operator ->* or operator .* and supply an object of type C as the left operand. You didn’t.

    I don’t know which object of type C is supposed to be used here – only you know that – but in your example it could be *this. In that case the call might look as follows

    (this->*p->pfn)(val)
    

    In order to make it look a bit less convoluted, you can introduce an intermediate variable

    PFN pfn = p->pfn;
    (this->*pfn)(val);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 261k
  • Answers 261k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Using this.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke is necessary to move code execution on the… May 13, 2026 at 11:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer form is probably a string rather than a Form object,… May 13, 2026 at 11:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Slf4j is indeed just a logging facade. However, Log4j is… May 13, 2026 at 11:30 am

Related Questions

I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
In order to apply a triggered animation to all ToolTip s in my app,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.