Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 140375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:36:12+00:00 2026-05-11T07:36:12+00:00

I’m getting frustrated trying to do a simple thing – I want to invoke

  • 0

I’m getting frustrated trying to do a simple thing – I want to invoke a method on a mock object and NOT check its return value. I just want to check that it was invoked with the correct parameters.

Example:

MyInterface mockObject = createMock(MyInterface.class); SomeObject param = new SomeObject();  /* the write object is not void and returns an instance of FooOjbect.  * I want to ignore everything to do with FooObject - I do not care what  * it is because I do not store its value. How do I do this? */ mockObject.write(param);  replay(mockObject);  someOtherObjectThatCallsAboveMockObject.process(mockObject);  verify(mockObject); 

So are there any EasyMock experts out there? I’m not concerned about the design of the underlying method that I’m calling and not storing the return value because the actually implementation is coming from a third-party networking library (Apache Mina) and I have no control over the API.

EDIT: Conclusion reached some time later

I dumped EasyMock because it wasn’t easy and went for Mockito.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:36:13+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:36 am

    Instead of

    mockObject.write(param) 

    write

    EasyMock.expect( mockObject.write(param) ).andReturn( /* return value here */ ); 

    You still need to return a value for the code to be correct but you can ignore the value further on in the test.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 100k
  • Answers 101k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is a pretty open ended question, but let me… May 11, 2026 at 8:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Short answer: It doesn't matter. cfscript does not output anything… May 11, 2026 at 8:00 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Don't do transaction management in Repository. Thats why you get… May 11, 2026 at 8:00 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.