Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8953871
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T14:11:45+00:00 2026-06-15T14:11:45+00:00

I’m going out on a limb here, assuming that it is possible but I’m

  • 0

I’m going out on a limb here, assuming that it is possible but I’m not quite sure. Basically what I’m looking for is a way to switch at compile-time between using a default constructor or a constructor that takes one argument by reference.

i.e.

T* create<T>()
{
    return new T(1); // if possible
}

T* create<T>()
{
    return new T(); // fallback to here
}

I’m using the VS2010 compiler and it does not support std::is_constructible but I can use decltype.

I went digging in the VS2012 type_traits header and looked at the std::is_constructible implementation and well I got a bit turned around. I don’t get it how people write code that way. The headers are the most convoluted piece of code I’ve ever seen. Anyway, I saw that it was using decltype and it got me think, hopefully someone with more experienced can provide me with an answer.

After going through @ipc’s answer I’ve settled on the following code

// std::declval is not supported by VS2010
template <typename T> typename std::add_rvalue_reference<T>::type declval();

template <class T, class R0>
decltype(new T(declval<R0>()))
createInstance_(R0& r0, int = 0)
{
    return new T(r0);
}

template <class T, class R0>
T*
createInstance_(R0&, ...)
{
    return new T();
}

The above code will work but it does confuse the IntelliSense Engine, anyway I thought it was nice that you could omit the extra function by simply using a default argument. I’ve tested this code with VS 2010 and it compiles fine and runs as expected.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T14:11:46+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 2:11 pm

    I have no VS2010 to check if it compiles there, but the following matches your example.

    template <typename T> // if std::declval is not supported by VS10
    typename std::add_rvalue_reference<T>::type declval();
    
    template <typename T>
    decltype(new T(declval<std::string>()))
    create_(std::string param, int) { return new T(param); }
    template <typename T>
    T * create_(std::string, ...) { return new T(); }
    
    template <typename T>
    T * create(std::string param) { return create_<T>(param, 0); }
    
    int main()
    {
      std::cout << *create<int>("a") << '\n';
      std::cout << *create<std::string>("b") << '\n';
    }
    

    Output:

    0
    b
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
I know there's a lot of other questions out there that deal with this
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I'm not entirely sure how I managed to jack this up. http://pretty-senshi.com If you
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.