Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 746281
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:04:23+00:00 2026-05-14T14:04:23+00:00

I’m gonna go with this design: create an object and keep it alive during

  • 0

I’m gonna go with this design:

create an object and keep it alive during all web-app session.

And I need to synchronize its state with database state.

What I want to achieve is that :

IF between my db operations, that is, modifications that I persist to a db

someone intentionally spoils table rows, then on next saving to a database

all those changes WOULD BE OVERWRITTEN with the object state, that always contains valid data.

What Hibernate methods do you recommend me to use to persist the modifications in a database?

saveOrUpdate() is a possible solution, but maybe there’s anything better?

Again, I repeat how it looks. First I create an object without collections. Persist it (save()).

Then user provides us with additional data. In a serviceLayer, again, we modify our object in memory (say, populate it with collections) and then, persist it again.

So every serviceLayer operation of the next step must simply guarantee that database contains the exact persistent copy of this object that we have in memory. If data in a database differ, it MUST BE OVERRIDDEN with the object (kept in memory) state.

What Session operations do you recommend?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:04:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:04 pm

    FWIW saveOrUpdate() looks like the best option overall:

    The saveOrUpdate() method is in practice more useful than update(),
    save(), or lock(): In complex conversations, you don’t know if the item is in
    detached state or if it’s new and transient and must be saved. The automatic
    state-detection provided by saveOrUpdate() becomes even more useful when you
    not only work with single instances, but also want to reattach or persist a network
    of connected objects and apply cascading options.

    However for your case, if you are sure the entity was modified in detached state, and/or don’t mind occasionally hitting the DB with an unnecessary UPDATE, maybe update() is the safest choice:

    The update() operation
    on the Session reattaches the detached object to the persistence context and
    schedules an SQL UPDATE. Hibernate must assume that the client modified the
    object while it was detached. […] The persistence context is flushed automatically
    when the second transaction in the conversation commits, and any
    modifications to the once detached and now persistent object are synchronized
    with the database.

    Quotes from Java Persistence with Hibernate, chapter 11.2.2.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.