Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4026528
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T10:58:53+00:00 2026-05-20T10:58:53+00:00

I’m having a problem in that I’m using an LdapConnection to make requests against

  • 0

I’m having a problem in that I’m using an LdapConnection to make requests against an AD LDS (formerly known as ADAM) datastore. Fine. But now requirements have come along to be able to “remotely” do this. Basically, a program we could count on always having access to the datastore now needs to do it through a “server” program on the “internal” network, so that the “client” on the external one only communicates through our new “server” program. There’s a reason (not a great one, but a reason) why we can’t just expose the AD LDS server to the outside. But they want it done “fast” and thus don’t want to re-engineer the client app (as should be what’s really happening). Thus we need to serialize the DataRequest and DataResponses to go to and from the “server” part.

Big problem: The DataResponses don’t seem to be serializable. During testing, a DataContractSerializer has no problem serializing my SearchRequest but the SearchResponse gets this:

System.Runtime.Serialization.InvalidDataContractException occurred
  Message="Type 'System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.SearchResponse' cannot be serialized. Consider marking it with the DataContractAttribute attribute, and marking all of its members you want serialized with the DataMemberAttribute attribute.  See the Microsoft .NET Framework documentation for other supported types."
  Source="System.Runtime.Serialization"
  StackTrace:
       at System.Runtime.Serialization.DataContract.DataContractCriticalHelper.ThrowInvalidDataContractException(String message, Type type)
  InnerException: 

OK. But neither type has Serializable or what not. So why does SearchRequest go through the process fine, and the response doesn’t?

But that doesn’t even matter in the end. How am I supposed to serialize a type that I can’t change, as it’s built-in to the .NET framework, and I can’t “re-make” because the constructor is internal? If I could just “take the information I needed” and re-make the class on the other end of my network connection, I would, but these types don’t have public constructors.

Any ideas? I’d even like to know why one of the types “just works” even without the right attributes for the DataContractSerializer but the other doesn’t.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T10:58:54+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:58 am

    The best – and probably only – approach is to create your own wrapper class and then read the result and store in the class and serialise.

    SearchResponse in fact is a COM wrapper and cannot be serialised.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.