Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6222353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:17:58+00:00 2026-05-24T08:17:58+00:00

I’m having a strange time dealing with selecting from a table with about 30,000

  • 0

I’m having a strange time dealing with selecting from a table with about 30,000 rows.

It seems my script is using an outrageous amount of memory for what is a simple, forward only walk over a query result.

Please note that this example is a somewhat contrived, absolute bare minimum example which bears very little resemblance to the real code and it cannot be replaced with a simple database aggregation. It is intended to illustrate the point that each row does not need to be retained on each iteration.

<?php
$pdo = new PDO('mysql:host=127.0.0.1', 'foo', 'bar', array(
    PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE=>PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION,
));
$stmt = $pdo->prepare('SELECT * FROM round');
$stmt->execute();

function do_stuff($row) {}

$c = 0;
while ($row = $stmt->fetch()) {
    // do something with the object that doesn't involve keeping 
    // it around and can't be done in SQL
    do_stuff($row);
    $row = null;
    ++$c;
}

var_dump($c);
var_dump(memory_get_usage());
var_dump(memory_get_peak_usage());

This outputs:

int(39508)
int(43005064)
int(43018120)

I don’t understand why 40 meg of memory is used when hardly any data needs to be held at any one time. I have already worked out I can reduce the memory by a factor of about 6 by replacing “SELECT *” with “SELECT home, away”, however I consider even this usage to be insanely high and the table is only going to get bigger.

Is there a setting I’m missing, or is there some limitation in PDO that I should be aware of? I’m happy to get rid of PDO in favour of mysqli if it can not support this, so if that’s my only option, how would I perform this using mysqli instead?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:17:58+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:17 am

    After creating the connection, you need to set PDO::MYSQL_ATTR_USE_BUFFERED_QUERY to false:

    <?php
    $pdo = new PDO('mysql:host=127.0.0.1', 'foo', 'bar', array(
        PDO::ATTR_ERRMODE=>PDO::ERRMODE_EXCEPTION,
    ));
    $pdo->setAttribute(PDO::MYSQL_ATTR_USE_BUFFERED_QUERY, false);
    
    // snip
    
    var_dump(memory_get_usage());
    var_dump(memory_get_peak_usage());
    

    This outputs:

    int(39508)
    int(653920)
    int(668136)
    

    Regardless of the result size, the memory usage remains pretty much static.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains
I have a text area in my form which accepts all possible characters from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.