I’m having issues understanding how to configure TFS according to best practices as provided by the TFS Ranger team. The issue is such:
My company has several products which make use of a shared common code base.
> $/Core
> -> /Main/Source (Parent Branch)
>
> $/Product1
> -> /Main/Source
> -> /Main/Source/Core/Source (Child Branch from $/Core)
> -> /Main/Source/...
>
> $/Product2
> -> /Main/Source
> -> /Main/Source/Core/Source (Child Branch from $/Core)
> -> /Main/Source/...
Therefore we have one team collection and say, three team projects for this example. ($/* is a team project)
Our initial release branching is a bit of a pain. Instead of branching on the /Main to /Releases, or /Main to /Development, we have been branching each project individually. (Not team project … solution project.)
This is due to the inability to have nested branch roots. (See TFS Errors: TF203028 and TF203071)
According to TFS Ranger Guide and our revised approach to branching releases, hotfixes, developments, we should branch from /Main rather than /Main/Source/Proj1,/Proj2,/Proj3, etc. It’s just become a rather large annoyance.
Ideally we would like:
> $/Product1
> -> /Main/ (Branch - Parent)
> -> /Releases
> -> /1.x
> /1 Service Pack (Child Branch from $/Product1/Main
> -> /1.0
> -> /1.0 Hotfix (Child Branch from $/Product1/Releases/1.x/1 Service Pack)
> -> /1.0 RTM (Child Branch from $/Product1/Releases/1.x/1.0/1.0 Hotfix - Read Only)
> -> /1.0.22 RTM (Child Branch from $/Product1/Releases/1.x/1.0/1.0 Hotfix - Read Only)
> -> /1.5
> -> /1.5 Hotfix (Child Branch from $/Product1/Releases/1.x/1 Service Pack)
> -> /1.5 RTM (Child Branch from $/Product1/Releases/1.x/1.5/1.5 Hotfix - Read Only)
Solutions:
1. We can convert each shared branch (ie. $/Core) back to regular folders. This way no folder under /Main is a branch root. We can then perform a baseless merge from $/Product1/Main/Source/Core/Source back to the parent $/Core/Source.
Has anyone any experience with baseless merges. What I’ve read from Microsoft is that they are exceptions which should not be commonplace. MS states that if you set up your projects properly with TFS, you would never need to perform a baseless merge.
How is this possible when branching across team projects?!? It should be commonplace in any software development house to have shared libraries amongst products.
I’m open to other solutions too.
Thanks!
I’ll throw an option in to the ring, it may or may not not be useful to you. If it’s any consolation I’ve been pondering over this one for a while now and haven’t been able to come up with a completely satisfactory solution. It’s a really good question and I’d be very interested in seeing how others have solved this problem.
I know it’s considered a good idea to build from source wherever possible but I’m not a fan of branching between Team Projects. If you have a some common code and it needs to be branched between 2 or 3 other Team Projects then the branching is manageable but if you have 20 or 30 (or 100) Team Projects then managing the merges becomes a headache. There can be other issues if the developers working in the consuming Team Projects don’t have the same permissions in the “master” such as not being able to see history etc. Of course if you have code that needs to be shared between Team Projects in different Project Collections then you can’t branch anyway.
So with that in mind I would suggest that you treat the common code in the same way you might treat a 3rd party library and use binary references. Once you get in to that mindset a number of options are available to you. (here are a few but there are probably more)
As I said, I’m very interested in hearing how other SOers have solved the shared code problem using TFS.
EDIT: After 8 years of thinking about this, Nuget packages are the way forward here. I’ve left the rest of the answer in place as it still gets views and up-votes. Building dependencies in to packages and storing them in a binary repository (nuget / Nexus / Artifactory / Azure Artifacts etc.) is pretty much the standard way of solving this problem