Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 79921
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:13:17+00:00 2026-05-10T21:13:17+00:00

I’m having some trouble navigating Java’s rule for inferring generic type parameters. Consider the

  • 0

I’m having some trouble navigating Java’s rule for inferring generic type parameters. Consider the following class, which has an optional list parameter:

import java.util.Collections; import java.util.List;  public class Person {   private String name;   private List<String> nicknames;      public Person(String name) {     this(name, Collections.emptyList());   }      public Person(String name, List<String> nicknames) {     this.name = name;     this.nicknames = nicknames;   } } 

My Java compiler gives the following error:

Person.java:9: The constructor Person(String, List<Object>) is undefined 

But Collections.emptyList() returns type <T> List<T>, not List<Object>. Adding a cast doesn’t help

public Person(String name) {   this(name,(List<String>)Collections.emptyList()); } 

yields

Person.java:9: inconvertible types 

Using EMPTY_LIST instead of emptyList()

public Person(String name) {   this(name, Collections.EMPTY_LIST); } 

yields

Person.java:9: warning: [unchecked] unchecked conversion 

Whereas the following change makes the error go away:

public Person(String name) {   this.name = name;   this.nicknames = Collections.emptyList(); } 

Can anyone explain what type-checking rule I’m running up against here, and the best way to work around it? In this example, the final code example is satisfactory, but with larger classes, I’d like to be able to write methods following this "optional parameter" pattern without duplicating code.

For extra credit: when is it appropriate to use EMPTY_LIST as opposed to emptyList()?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:13:18+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:13 pm

    The issue you’re encountering is that even though the method emptyList() returns List<T>, you haven’t provided it with the type, so it defaults to returning List<Object>. You can supply the type parameter, and have your code behave as expected, like this:

    public Person(String name) {   this(name,Collections.<String>emptyList()); } 

    Now when you’re doing straight assignment, the compiler can figure out the generic type parameters for you. It’s called type inference. For example, if you did this:

    public Person(String name) {   List<String> emptyList = Collections.emptyList();   this(name, emptyList); } 

    then the emptyList() call would correctly return a List<String>.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm trying to decode HTML entries from here NYTimes.com and I cannot figure out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.