Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8413711
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T00:58:20+00:00 2026-06-10T00:58:20+00:00

I’m having trouble trying to implement __eq__ for a Rect class I wrote as

  • 0

I’m having trouble trying to implement __eq__ for a Rect class I wrote as a C extension. I tried defining a method called __eq__, but Python seems to override it.

static PyObject *
Rect___eq__(Rect *self, PyObject *other)
{
    Rect *rect = (Rect *) other;
    if (self->x != rect->x || self->y != rect->y || 
            self->width != rect->width || self->height != rect->height) {
        Py_RETURN_FALSE;
    } else {
        Py_RETURN_TRUE;
    }
}

static PyMethodDef Rect_methods[] = {
    {"__eq__", (PyCFunction)Rect___eq__, METH_VARARGS,
     "Compare Rects" },
    {NULL}  /* Sentinel */
};

It seems no matter what I do, Python defaults to “is” behavior:

>>> a = Rect(1, 2, 3, 4)
>>> b = Rect(1, 2, 3, 4)
>>> a == b
False
>>> a == a
True
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T00:58:22+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 12:58 am

    When working with new types defined in C, you need to define tp_richcompare. Below is an implementation of rich compare for a type that always compares larger than all other types (except itself):

    static PyObject *
    Largest_richcompare(PyObject *self, PyObject *other, int op)
    {
        PyObject *result = NULL;
    
        if (UndefinedObject_Check(other)) {
            result = Py_NotImplemented;
        }
        else {
            switch (op) {
            case Py_LT:
                result = Py_False;
                break;
            case Py_LE:
                result = (LargestObject_Check(other)) ? Py_True : Py_False;
                break;
            case Py_EQ:
                result = (LargestObject_Check(other)) ? Py_True : Py_False;
                break;
            case Py_NE:
                result = (LargestObject_Check(other)) ? Py_False : Py_True;
                break;
            case Py_GT:
                result = (LargestObject_Check(other)) ? Py_False : Py_True;
                break;
            case Py_GE:
                result = Py_True;
                break;
            }
        }
    
        Py_XINCREF(result);
        return result;
    }
    

    If you are using Python 3.x, you add it to the type object like this:

    (richcmpfunc)&Largest_richcompare,       /* tp_richcompare */
    

    If you are using Python 2.x, there is an extra step involved. Rich comparisons were added during the lifetime of Python 2.x and for a few versions of Python, a C extension could optionally define tp_richcomare. To inform Python 2.x that your type implements rich comparisons, you need to modify tp_flags by or-ing in Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_RICHCOMPARE.

    Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT|Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_RICH_COMPARE,        /* tp_flags */
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I'm having trouble keeping the paragraph square between the quote marks. In firefox the
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
Basically, what I'm trying to create is a page of div tags, each has
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I am doing a simple coin flipping experiment for class that involves flipping a
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.