Home/ Questions/Q 297367
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-12T06:38:00+00:00

I’m having trouble with a particular version of Pocket IE running under Windows Mobile

  • 0

I’m having trouble with a particular version of Pocket IE running under Windows Mobile 5.0. Unfortunately, I’m not sure of the exact version numbers.

We had a problem whereby this particular ‘installation’ would return a locally cached version of a page when the wireless network was switched off. Fair enough, no problem. We cleared the cache of the handheld and started sending the following headers:

Expires: Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
Last-Modified: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:42:08 GMT

The Last-Modified header is calculated on the fly and set to ‘now’.

Even still, the handheld seems to be caching these pages: the page is sent with the headers but then when they disconnect the wireless network and click a link to the page (that was not supposed to be cached) it still returns this cached file.

Is there some other header/s that should be sent, or is this just a problem with Pocket IE? Or is it possibly something entirely different?

Thanks!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I’m not sure I can answer your question since I have no Pocket IE to test with, but maybe I can offer something that can help.

    This is a very good caching reference: http://www.mnot.net/cache_docs/

    Also, I’m not sure whether your example is the pasted results of your headers, or the code that you’ve set up to send the headers, but I believe the collection of headers in most language implementations (and by extension I assume most browser implementations) is treated as a map; therefore, it’s possible you’ve overwritten “no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate” with the second “Cache-Control” header. In other words, only one can get sent, and if last wins, you only sent “post-check=0, pre-check=0”.

    You could also try adding the max-age=0 header.

    In my experience both Firefox and IE have seemed more sensitive to pages served by HTTPS as well. You could try that if you have it as an option.

    If you still have no luck, and Pocket IE is behaving clearly differently from Windows IE, then my guess is that the handheld has special rules for caching based on the assumption that it will often be away from internet connectivity.

    Edit:
    After you mentioned CNN.com, and I realized that you do not have the “private” header in Cache-Control. I think this is what is making CNN.com cache the page but not yours. I believe “private” is the most strict setting available in the “Cache-Control header. Try adding that.

    For example, here are CNN’s headers. (I don’t think listing “private” twice has any effect)

    Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:05:42 GMT
Server: Apache
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Cache-Control: max-age=60, private, private
Expires: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:06:41 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Vary: User-Agent,Accept-Encoding
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 21221

200 OK

    If you don’t have the Firefox Web Developer Toolbar, it’s a great tool to check Response Headers of any site – in the “Information” dropdown, “View Reponse Headers” is at the bottom.

    • 0