Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8543701
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T12:22:10+00:00 2026-06-11T12:22:10+00:00

I’m hoping to understand why I’m getting different behavior when attemping to chain a

  • 0

I’m hoping to understand why I’m getting different behavior when attemping to chain a deferred object directly than I do when attempting to chain by saving the object in a variable and invoking one or more deferred methods on that variable.

When saving the object in a variable, the value sent in to each function is the same (in the case of the code snippet below, 5) – i.e. the values don’t filter in this case. When chained directly, the values filter… so I’m unclear on how get filtering to occur when setting up a Deferred.pipe() in several different statements. And by my reading of the jquery docs, it should be possible:

The Deferred object is chainable, similar to the way a jQuery object is chainable, but it has its own methods. After creating a Deferred object, you can use any of the methods below by either chaining directly from the object creation or saving the object in a variable and invoking one or more methods on that variable.

What am I doing wrong?

Here is my code:

<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
// This works as expected - alert(20)

var defer = new $.Deferred();
defer.pipe(myFunction).pipe(myFunction).pipe(myAlert);
defer.resolve(5);

// This does not work as expected - alert(5)
var defer2 = new $.Deferred();
defer2.pipe(myFunction);
defer2.pipe(myFunction);
defer2.pipe(myAlert);
defer2.resolve(5);

});

var myFunction = function (value) {
return value * 2;
}

var myAlert = function (value) {
alert('The value is ' + value);
}
</script>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T12:22:11+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    The $.Deferred object is indeed chainable, but in your second scenario, you are not chaining anything; you are just assigning multiple pipes to the $.Deferred object to be executed independently, when the $.Deferred is either resolved or rejected. In other words, you are ignoring the returned Promise object which contains the filtered/modified value to be passed to the next .pipe() in the chain.

    From the docs:

    The deferred.pipe() method returns a new promise that filters the
    status and values of a deferred through a function.

    To achieve what you want in your second example, pipe the resulting Promise instead of the original $.Deferred object:

    var defer2 = new $.Deferred();
    var promise = defer2.pipe(myFunction);
    promise = promise.pipe(myFunction); // pipe and update promise
    promise.pipe(myAlert);
    defer2.resolve(5);
    

    DEMO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
i got an object with contents of html markup in it, for example: string
I've tracked down a weird MySQL problem to the two different ways I was
I have a .ini file as follows: [playlist] numberofentries=2 File1=http://87.230.82.17:80 Title1=(#1 - 365/1400) Example
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
I want to count how many characters a certain string has in PHP, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.