Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 219525
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:51:12+00:00 2026-05-11T18:51:12+00:00

I’m implementing a lock-free mechanism using atomic (double) compare and swap instructions e.g. cmpxchg16b

  • 0

I’m implementing a lock-free mechanism using atomic (double) compare and swap instructions e.g. cmpxchg16b

I’m currently writing this in assembly and then linking it in. However, I wondered if there was a way of getting the compiler to do this for me automatically? e.g. surround code block with ‘atomically’ and have it go figure it out how to implement the code as an atomic instruction in the underlying processor architecture (or generate an error at compile time if the underlying arch does not support it)?

P.S. I know that gcc has some built-ins (at least for CAS)

http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.0/gcc/Atomic-Builtins.html#Atomic-Builtins

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:51:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:51 pm

    Already kindof answered here.

    The C++0x standard will provide some atomic datatypes, mainly integer and void types using std::atomic<> template. That article mentions Boehm’s atomic_ops project which you can download and use today.

    If not, can’t you implement your assembler inline in the compiler? I know MSVC has the __asm keyword for inline assembler routines. Google says yes, gcc can do it too.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 126k
  • Answers 126k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can't fix the function. Nothing in the spec requires… May 12, 2026 at 5:21 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Inline event handlers work. They are just a bad design… May 12, 2026 at 5:21 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is a situation where "teach a man to fish"… May 12, 2026 at 5:21 am

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.