Question

I’m in charge of updating an existing java app for an embedded device (a copier).

One of the things I want to do is create a servlet which allows the download of all the files in our sandboxed directory on the device (which will include the application log files, local caches, etc). At the moment these files are all in a single directory with no subdirectories.

Basically what I’d like to do is as follows:

• Log.log
• Log.log.1
• Log.log.2
• SomeLocalCache.txt
• AnotherLocalCache.txt

where each line is a clickable link allowing download of the file.

However, my HTML experience is basically nil, and my familiarity with the Java API is still fairly rudimentary, so I’m looking for some advice on the proper way to go about it.

I’ve read through all the samples provided, and here’s what I’m thinking.

I can create a servlet at a specified URL on the device which will call into my code. Let’s call this /MyApp.

I add another link below that, let’s call it /MyApp/Download.

When this address it reached in a browser, it displays the list of files.

This list will have to be created on the fly. I can create an HTML template file and put it in the res folder (this seems to be the recommended method for the device in question), but the whole list of files/links will need to be substituted in at run time. Here’s an example I found using <ol>+<li> tags for the list and <a> tags for the links. I can generate that on the fly pretty easily. Is that a reasonable way to go?

e.g.

<ol>
  <li>
    <a href=".../MyApp/Download/Log.log">Log.log</a>
  </li>
  <!--more <li> elements-->
</ol>

Clicking on an individual file will link to /MyApp/Download/File.ext which will then trigger the file download via my servlet (I’ve found this code which looks promising for the actual download).

The device will require users to log before they are allowed to access the /MyApp link or any sub-links, and I can additionally require that the logged in user be an admin before allowing file download, which together seems like sufficient security in this case (heavy security is not required for these files).

So am I missing anything big or is this a reasonable plan of engagement?

Answer 1

EDIT

Judging by this link when to use UL or OL in html? Many people are going to hammer the answer and comment below because they say it is important to put semantic information into the HTML.

My point is simply this — the only difference is browsers will display one with bullet points (as OP seems to want) and one with numbers (as the OP does not want.) I suggest he change the HTML to the way he wants it to render, or leave it as is, and make some CSS changes.

Yes there is a semantic difference between the two… they will both still render in order as defined here http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html Is the HTML the place to put semantic information? I think not, code that generated the HTML is the correct place. Your cohesion may vary.

I won’t change my original comment for the sake of history.

END EDIT

Seems fine to me — however <ol> is not really used any more, I’d go with <ul>. Don’t worry, it is still ordered as you would expect.

The reason for this is the only difference between the two was browsers would automatically number (render with a number before) ordered lists. However, with CSS all the rendering control can be in the CSS (including numbering) and everyone is happy.

Hardly anyone uses the auto number anymore. In fact via CSS, lists can and are used for all sorts of crazy things, including CSS menuing systems.