Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 73097
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:08:53+00:00 2026-05-10T20:08:53+00:00

I’m in the process of establishing some new source control best practices for my

  • 0

I’m in the process of establishing some new source control best practices for my organization, so I’ve been immersing myself in things like TreeSurgeon for the past few days.

One thing I see a lot is that it’s a best practice to include your references in your source control tree, but in a seperate directory (lib/ in tree surgeon) rather than directly with your code as they naturally appear in ASP.NET projects.

I know a few reasons why it’s bad to source control them directly in the bin folder, but I want to understand the big picture including how you get those references back into, say, an ASP.NET project after you pull down code from source control on a fresh machine.

Thanks in advance!

Brian

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:08:53+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:08 pm

    You want your external dependencies in a separate folder for several reasons:

    • you have clear understanding of what is included in that particular external dependency
    • you can add non-build related things like site links, documentation, samples and others without polluting your project
    • you can share that dependency between multiple projects
    • you don’t want to mix build artefacts with source, as it makes it unclear what is owned by you/your team and what is not
    • you want to have explicit steps that bring the external dependencies during build to ensure you have control over what is in the final package
    • branching sources will create multiple copies of your dependencies if they are mixed there as well
    • lesser chance of some rookie accidentally checking in another version of a file and messing your external dependencies, thus destabilizing your project

    To answer your second question:

    We usually have a copy of the external dependency in a separate folder, but still under a source control. All project references point to that folder using relative paths. Thus, when people enlist on new machine, they get a full set of sources plus external dependencies ready for building the product.

    Also, our build has an additional step that produces clean drop folder outside of the source tree. This is our deployment copy and it contains all the build artefacts and copy of all sources like .aspx that are needed for the final product to work. This enforces people to really think what needs to be included in the final product.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 59k
  • Answers 59k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer The error code and the description of the error states… May 11, 2026 at 8:57 am
  • added an answer Can I answer my own question? I believe I have… May 11, 2026 at 8:57 am
  • added an answer Check out the BitConverter class. Here's an example of how… May 11, 2026 at 8:57 am

Related Questions

No related questions found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.