Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7695051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T21:27:31+00:00 2026-05-31T21:27:31+00:00

I’m in the process of migrating a rather extensive REST service from WCF to

  • 0

I’m in the process of migrating a rather extensive REST service from WCF to ASP.NET WebAPI. We are using the Authorization header to send tokens from client to the server, and I implemented a DelegateHandler with code that responds with a 401 as soon as it sees there is no valid Authorization header. A simplification of the code can be seen here:

public class AuthenticationHandler : DelegatingHandler
{
    protected override Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        if (request == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("request");
        return !IsClientAuthorized(request)
            ? Task<HttpResponseMessage>.Factory.StartNew(() => new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized))
            : base.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken);
    }

    private bool IsClientAuthorized(HttpRequestMessage request)
    {
        return request != null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(request.Headers.Authorization.ToString());
    }
}

It works fine when hosted in IIS, but for integration tests I am using HttpSelfHostServer, and here the Authorization header is not present on the HttpRequestMessage, even though I can see it was sent on the Fiddler trace.

I tried to make a really simple WebAPI application using self hosting to verify that the problem is consistent, but unfortunately it works as expected there. So it must be related to my code somehow, but I am completely blank to what is causing it.

Has anyone else seen this behavior, or does anyone have suggestions for how to trace where in the WebAPI stack it goes wrong?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T21:27:32+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:27 pm

    The problem turned out to be caused by the format of the Authorization header being sent. We would expect the Authorization header to look something like this:

    Authorization: 42w4hGtmB7blLOXjcsx8AIbBEhxNpQpj3VNnf89vvjAkJEoX9S+JtmkYZcth+B9y/8Cc3tm1XDOFxGTqN1Hi2Q==
    

    This worked fine under WCF, but it is not formatted according to the HTTP standard, which expects a scheme and a value. For example:

    Authorization: XAPI 42w4hGtmB7blLOXjcsx8AIbBEhxNpQpj3VNnf89vvjAkJEoX9S+JtmkYZcth+B9y/8Cc3tm1XDOFxGTqN1Hi2Q==
    

    My guess is that with only the value in the header, Web API would regard this as the scheme, and only certain characters are allowed in here. When I added XAPI as the scheme and used the same value everything worked fine, and the Authorization header was available to my code on HttpRequestMessage.Headers.Authorization.

    However I think it is a bug in Web API, that the request is allowed to proceed and the header is just ignored, if it had an invalid format. I would expect it to respond with a 400 Bad Request if a header was invalid according to specification.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have thousands of HTML files to process using Groovy/Java and I need to
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
We are using XSLT to translate a RIXML file to XML. Our RIXML contains

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.