Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 178523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:14:45+00:00 2026-05-11T14:14:45+00:00

I’m interested in testing the performance of my django apps as I go, what

  • 0

I’m interested in testing the performance of my django apps as I go, what is the best way to get line by line performance data?

note: Googling this returns lots of people benchmarking django itself. I’m not looking for a benchmarks of django, I’m trying to test the performance of the django apps that I’m writing 🙂

Thanks!

edit: By ‘line by line’ I just mean timing individual functions, db calls, etc to find out where the bottlenecks are on a very granular level

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:14:46+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:14 pm

    There’s two layers to this. We have most of #1 in place for our testing. We’re about to start on #2.

    1. Django in isolation. The ordinary Django unit tests works well here. Create some tests that cycle through a few (less than 6) ‘typical’ use cases. Get this, post that, etc. Collect timing data. This isn’t real web performance, but it’s an easy-to-work with test scenario that you can use for tuning.

    2. Your whole web stack. In this case, you need a regular server running Squid, Apache, Django, MySQL, whatever. You need a second computer(s) to act a client exercise your web site through urllib2, doing a few (less than 6) ‘typical’ use cases. Get this, post that, etc. Collect timing data. This still isn’t ‘real’ web performance, because it isn’t through the internet, but it’s as close as you’re going to get without a really elaborate setup.

    Note that the #2 (end-to-end) includes a great deal of caching for performance. If your client scripts are doing similar work, caching will be really beneficial. if your client scripts do unique things each time, caching will be less beneficial.

    The hardest part is determining what the ‘typical’ workload is. This isn’t functional testing, so the workload doesn’t have to include everything. Also, the more concurrent sessions your client is running, the slower it becomes. Don’t struggle trying to optimize your server when your test client is the slowest part of the processing.


    Edit

    If ‘line-by-line’ means ‘profiling’, well, you’ve got to get a Python profiler running.

    https://docs.python.org/library/profile.html

    Note that there’s plenty of caching in the Django ORM layer. So running a view function a half-dozen times to get a meaningful set of measurements isn’t sensible. You have to run a ‘typical’ set of operations and then find hot-spots in the profile.

    Generally, your application is easy to optimize — you shouldn’t be doing much. Your view functions should be short and have no processing to speak of. Your form and model method functions, similarly, should be very short.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I'm trying to convert HTML to plain text. I get many &\#8217; &\#8220; etc.
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I'm interested in microtypography issues on the web. I want a tool to fix:
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
This could be a duplicate question, but I have no idea what search terms

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.