Question

I’m interested in url signing (e.g. http://…/?somearg=value&anotherarg=anothervalue&sig=aSKS9F3KL5xc), but I have a few requirements which have left me without a solution yet.

• I’ll be using either PHP or Python for pages, so I’ll need to be able to sign and verify a signature using one of the two.
• My plan was to use a priv/pub key scheme to sign some data, and be able to verify that the signature is valid, but here’s where it gets complicated:
• The data is not known when the verification is happening (it is not just somearg=value&anotherarg=anothervalue)

My first instinct was to use OpenSSL, e.g. with a RSA keypair, to do something along the lines of signing by: openssl rsautl -sign -inkey private.pem -in sensitive -out privsigned and verifying based on the privsigned data and key ONLY: openssl rsautl -verify -inkey public.pem -in privsigned -pubin.

Using PHP’s openssl_get_privatekey() and openssl_sign() signs the data just fine, but I need to know the (decrypted!) data in order to verify (which I will not have): openssl_get_publickey() and openssl_verify($data, $signature, $pubkeyid); from http://php.net/openssl_verify.

Or am I missing something here?

---

So I looked into HMAC, but although many hash function are available in both Python and PHP, I’m baffled as to how I’d go about verifying the hash.
PHP‘s hash_hmac() allows me to create a hash using a “key” (or in this case a string-key). But how do I go about verifying that a hash is valid (i.e. &sig= hasn’t just been manually put in by the end user &sig=abcdefg1234.

So to sum up (sorry for the long question): How can I verify that a signature/hash has been made by my server’s (cert/string)key (given I can not verify by redoing the hash of said data)? And do you have any preferences as to which route I should chose, Priv/pub-key or HMAC?

Any pointers big or small is greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance,

• Josh

Answer 1

HMAC is a symmetric algorithm, so there is no separate creation and checking algorithm. To check, you simply compute the hash as it should have been computed originally, and check that the result equals what you actually got from the client. The security rests on the HMAC key only existing on your server.

Unless you need the signatures to be verifiable by someone who doesn’t know the secret key, HMAC is probably a better choice than public-key systems, for reasons of efficiency. It can take several milliseconds to create or verify a public-key signature (some years ago I timed one implementation at 15 ms per operation), whereas HMAC is quite fast.

(Oh, and you cannot verify any kind of signature without knowing the data it’s supposed to sign. That wouldn’t make any sense, as far as I can see).