Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 98433
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T00:11:42+00:00 2026-05-11T00:11:42+00:00

I’m just learning ruby and trying to understand the scope of code executed in

  • 0

I’m just learning ruby and trying to understand the scope of code executed in blocks. For example, I want to be able to create a block that affects the method that it is attached to, like so:

def test(&block)   block.call() if block_given?   puts 'in test, foo is #{foo}'   puts 'in test, bar is #{bar}' end  test() {   foo='this is foo'   bar='this is bar' } 

In this case I don’t want to have to modify the block at all — I want to be able to write it using simple variable references and no parameters. Only by making changes to the ‘test’ method in the above example, is it possible to access the variables defined in the block?

Again, the goal is to leave the block unmodified, but be able to access the created variables from within ‘test’ after the block executes.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T00:11:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:11 am

    First of all, block.call() is done with yield, and you don’t need the &block parameter that way.

    You can’t normally do what you want, blocks are bound when they are created, and inside the block you can see the local variables defined at that moment; the easiest way to do what you want, which is not how you will use blocks normally, is this:

    def test()   foo = yield if block_given?   puts 'in test, foo is #{foo}' end  test() {   foo='this is foo' } 

    But that’s only a side effect because foo is ‘returned’ by the block. If you instead do this:

    def test()   foo = yield if block_given?   puts 'in test, foo is #{foo}' end  test() {   foo='this is foo'   'ha ha, no foo for you' } 

    You’ll notice that it does something different.

    Here’s more magic:

    def test(&block)    foo = eval 'foo', block.binding    puts foo    block.call    foo = eval 'foo', block.binding    puts foo end  foo = 'before test' test() {   foo = 'after test'   'ha ha, no foo for you' } 

    That would kind of work, but it breaks if you remove foo = 'before test' because foo becomes a local variable in the block and does not exist in the binding.

    Summary: you can’t access local variables from a block, just the locals where the block was defined and the return value of the block.

    Even this won’t work:

    def test(&block)    eval 'foo = 'go fish'', block.binding    block.call    bar = eval 'foo', block.binding    puts bar end 

    because the foo in the binding is different from the local in the block (I didn’t know this, thanks).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 80k
  • Answers 80k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Download the Visual Studio SDK. Go to the Visual Studio… May 11, 2026 at 4:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The quickest, if not tidiest, solution that comes to mind… May 11, 2026 at 4:22 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Help came from Mitchel Sellers. He pointed out that the… May 11, 2026 at 4:22 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.