Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 94583
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T23:31:27+00:00 2026-05-10T23:31:27+00:00

I’m looking at setting up unit tests and integration testing, but I’ve run into

  • 0

I’m looking at setting up unit tests and integration testing, but I’ve run into the problem that the connection string in the web.config is unavailable for testing. The solution we’ve come up with to get around this is to have another connection string for testing, but I was wondering if there was a better way.

The other half of the issue is setting up and tearing down the test db. Right now we just have a giant test that sets up the db before running and then tears it down afterwards. That way we can control the order that the test run to make sure the results are proper.

Just looking to see if there are better ways/tools to use for testing an ASP.Net app.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T23:31:28+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 11:31 pm

    The recommended approach is to architect your system that you can test your code without a DB. What this means to a code perspective is using seperation of concerns. You want all of your core business logic seperated from your pages. You can do this using a MVC or MPV pattern, which if you good you can find a great deal about.

    Right now there is ASP.Net MVC; however, the MVC pattern has been used in ASP.Net long before this framework existed so if your looking at enhancing an existing web forms app make sure you don’t end up looking at the more recent buzz which is about ASP.Net MVC as a programing model in ASP.Net.

    Now let’s say you have your core logic for handling a button click isolated from page so you have a Class let’s call it WidgetController. The widget controller might have a method of HandleClick() which performs your business logic.

    Let’s further assume that your business logic requires data access. You can again use seperation of concerns. Your business logic shouldn’t care how to access the DB, all it needs is the data let another class get the data. A popular way of seperating data is by using a Depedancy Injection or Inversion of Control model (DI, IoC respectivley). Essentially what you do is define an interface for your data access, and your controller will program against the interface. You then at runtime provide the actual class to your controller via some method (Property, Constructor etc…)

    What this does is it allows you to provide MOCK implementations during runtime which seperates your DB. The mocks will implement your interface and you can just new up the objects your tests will need store them in memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 89k
  • Answers 89k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First, let me point out that I'm no Firebird expert,… May 11, 2026 at 5:52 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer According to the JPA spec (see JSR-220) chapter 2.1.1 you… May 11, 2026 at 5:52 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I believe you should use UTF-8 Encoding instead. The correct… May 11, 2026 at 5:52 pm

Related Questions

I ran into a problem. Wrote the following code snippet: teksti = teksti.Trim() teksti
I am currently running into a problem where an element is coming back from
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.