Home/ Questions/Q 171839
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T13:03:32+00:00

I’m looking at using xgettext to aid translation of large codebase, and I have

  • 0

I’m looking at using xgettext to aid translation of large codebase, and I have two questions:

  • if I have one .po file per-language, is there an easy way to update them all using a single xgettext scan of the codebase, or must I run xgettext once for each language?
  • if I add the target langauge to the .po file header with poedit, xgettext seems to overwrite this with default headers. How can I stop this?

Maybe I’m using the wrong tool, in which case suggestions are welcome. What I want is to be able to scan the code and update the .po files with any new strings, but leaving any header information intact.

EDIT: I know that poedit can scan code, but I was hoping to find a command line application to perform the scanning to automate the process more easily.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Yes, basically you’re using the tools wrong.

    xgettext extracts the tags and creates the template file. (e.g. *.pot file)

    The msgmerge command updates a .po file with changes from the .pot file.

    We have make rules to update the .po files, like the one below:

    %.en.po : %.pot     -[ -e $@ ] && msgmerge --width=110 --update $@ $<     [ -e $@ ] || cp $< $@
    • 0