Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7749295
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T11:00:40+00:00 2026-06-01T11:00:40+00:00

I’m looking for a better solution for two things: How can I understand if

  • 0

I’m looking for a better solution for two things:

  • How can I understand if the data is fetched and ready, I use BasicDealList.on("reset", function(){}) to understand if the data is fetched from ajax and parsed and ready to be used but it feels dirty.

  • If an empty JSON comes from fetching such as {}, it still shows BasicDealList.length as 1 while it should be 0 thus I was forced to check if the first element is empty via collection.length == 1 && jQuery.isEmptyObject(BasicDealList.toJSON()[0] which is very ugly.

Here is the code:

BasicDeal = Backbone.Model.extend();    
BasicDealCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({
    model: BasicDeal,
    url: '/some/ajax/url/',
});
BasicDealList = new BasicDealCollection();

BasicDealList.on("reset", function(collection, response){
    isEmpty = collection.length == 1 && jQuery.isEmptyObject(BasicDealList.toJSON()[0]);
    if (isEmpty){
    // render no deal found html
    }
    else{ 
    // render list of deals
    }
}
BasicDealList.fetch();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T11:00:41+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 11:00 am

    If you don’t like listening for reset, you can pass a callback directly to .fetch():

    BasicDealList.fetch({
        success: function(collection, response){
            // ...
        }
    });
    

    If, later in your app, you want to know whether you’ve fetched the data already, you could usually just check BasicDealList.length. If you want to avoid making repeated requests for collections that are actually empty on the server, you’ll probably need to work out a custom solution, e.g. setting a flag on .fetch():

    BasicDealList.fetch({
        success: function(collection, response){
            BasicDealList.fetched = true;
            // ...
        }
    });
    

    As for the empty data issue, you should be returning [] from the server instead of {}. Backbone’s Collection calls this.add(models, ...) within .reset(), and .add() checks whether the models argument is an array; if it’s not, it wraps it in one:

    models = _.isArray(models) ? models.slice() : [models];
    

    So passing {} will result in models set to [{}], which is not what you want. If you can’t control the server, you could do the check for {} in a custom .parse() method, returning [] if it’s found.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I am trying to understand how to use SyndicationItem to display feed which is
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I want to construct a data frame in an Rcpp function, but when I
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
Does anyone know how can I replace this 2 symbol below from the string
I need a function that will clean a strings' special characters. I do NOT
I'm trying to use string.replace('’','') to replace the dreaded weird single-quote character: ’ (aka

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.