Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 565267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:51:14+00:00 2026-05-13T12:51:14+00:00

I’m looking for a simple solution to replace my standardized junk way of validating

  • 0

I’m looking for a simple solution to replace my standardized junk way of validating whether a record exists before attempting to retrieve the data. Currently, whenever one of my methods are called, I do something to the effect of…

private Record DoSomething(int id)
{
   if(data.Records.Count(q=>q.Id==id) > 0)
   {
      return data.Records.First(q=>q.Id==id);
   }
   return null;
}

…where I always check the count of the records to determine the existence of a record. There has to be a more “elegant” way of doing this, without calling the database twice. Is there a way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:51:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:51 pm

    There are a lot of clean ways to handle this. If you want the first Record corresponding to id you can say:

    Record record = data.Records.FirstOrDefault(r => r.Id == id);
    if(record != null) {
        // record exists
    }
    else {
        // record does not exist
    }
    

    If you only want to know if such a Record exists:

    return data.Records.Any(r => r.Id == id); // true if exists
    

    If you want a count of how many such Record exists:

    return data.Records.Count(r => r.Id == id);
    

    If you want an enumeration (IEnumerable<Record>) of all such Record:

    return data.Records.Where(r => r.Id == id);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.