Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 557351
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:01:02+00:00 2026-05-13T12:01:02+00:00

I’m looking for a very compact way of storing a dense variable length bitarray

  • 0

I’m looking for a very compact way of storing a dense variable length bitarray in Java. Right now, I’m using BitSet, but it seems to use on average 1.5*n bits of storage space for a bit vector of size n. Typically, this isn’t a problem, but in this case the bitarrays being stored are a pretty significant part the memory footprint of the application. So, it would really help to get them to be a little bit smaller.

The space required by BitSet seems to be due to the fact that the array of longs used to back the data structure tends to double each time it is expanded to hold more bits:

// BitSet's resizing code
private void ensureCapacity(int wordsRequired) {
  if (words.length < wordsRequired) {
    // Allocate larger of doubled size or required size
    int request = Math.max(2 * words.length, wordsRequired);
    words = Arrays.copyOf(words, request);
    sizeIsSticky = false;
  }
}

I could write my own alternative implementation of BitSet that scales the backend data structure more conservatively. But, I’d really hate to duplicate functionality that is already in the standard class libraries if I don’t have to.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:01:02+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:01 pm

    If you create the BitSet using the constructor BitSet(int nbits) you can specify the capacity. If you guess the capacity wrong, and go over, it will double the size.

    The BitSet class does have a trimToSize method which is private, and is called by writeObject and clone(). If you clone your object, or serialize it, it will trim it to the correct length (assuming the class over expanded it through the ensureCapacity method).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 361k
  • Answers 361k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As a matter of fact, collation affects nothing of a… May 14, 2026 at 2:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Wasabi, not public, probably not :-) May 14, 2026 at 2:55 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Just check the value of the REQUEST_FILENAME variable: RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}… May 14, 2026 at 2:55 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.