Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3849048
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T16:47:41+00:00 2026-05-19T16:47:41+00:00

I’m looking for advice or critique of a design concept for coalescing Runnable objects

  • 0

I’m looking for advice or critique of a design concept for coalescing Runnable objects posted to a Handler. The case is that I have a background thread that generates small chunks of work that must be done on the event thread. Each chunk is posted to a Handler as a Runnable in the usual way. It turns out that if one of these Runnables has not started executing, it would be easy to modify it to do additional work when it does run instead of constructing and posting another Runnable. This coalescing of work chunks would be both cheaper than constructing another Runnable and would also cut down on the problem of the background thread flooding the event queue.

There are a couple of problems, though. First, I need to have access to the last Runnable delivered to the event queue. As far as I know, neither Handler nor Looper offer any such function, so I was planning to just keep a reference to the last posted Runnable in my background thread code. I’m just assuming that maintaining a reference like this isn’t going to cause problems anywhere in the system.

The more serious issue is that I’d have to have some way of knowing if a Runnable has been taken off the queue and started. I plan to handle that by adding a flag to my Runnable class and setting at the start of the run() method. There would still be some synchronizing necessary to avoid race conditions between testing the flag and updating the Runnable (background thread) and setting the flag once the Runnable starts executing (event thread).

Has anyone done anything like this, and if so, how did you do it? Am I overlooking something that I need to deal with?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T16:47:41+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 4:47 pm

    That seems like a way to code some nasty bugs.
    I have a program, that receives feed veeeeery often and posts it on multiple components, and it actually doesn’t do much harm and doesn’t have any visible side effects.

    If you really want to go with it (I might not fully understand your situation), wouldn’t it be easier, to have some “work chunks” pool, where all the needed work will be stored and some kind of work starter that will launch a new Runnable once in a while.
    It goes like this:

    With the first event, the “work starter” posts a runnable to a handler. This runnable asks the pool to give him all the work currently available and processes it, at the end it tells the “work starter” that it has finished, starter runs another runnable, that asks the pool for a new work, etc…
    The runnable you post can be a subclass of your own worker runnable, to make those queries to the pool and report about finished work easier. No need to store flags, or change runnables. And no need to deal with concurrency problems (if you have only 1 handler that is)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I have just tried to save a simple *.rtf file with some websites and
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.