Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7024605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T23:51:47+00:00 2026-05-27T23:51:47+00:00

I’m looking for good articles around image resolutions, size and quality for web pages,

  • 0

I’m looking for good articles around image resolutions, size and quality for web pages, especially around how this affects web sites currently.

I’m working on a web site for a client, and as an honour graduate in arts and design, the client is persistent that her 7mb – 10mb images are sufficient for her web site, totalling in at almost 400mb. I’ve tried arguing bandwidth limitations and performance but these are not holding ground.

The standard for images are at 72dpi, no larger than your standard screen resolution (1024×768) and above 1mb in size (which is already too large in my opinion). my argument is that loading 7mb+ files into a gallery on page load will seriously hinder the users experience if they have to wait a long period of time for 7 – 10 images to first get streamed into cache before the page is loaded, and even testing this with lazy loading plug-ins (we don’t want to go flash) and late-loading has performance penalties.

Does anyone on here have any recommendation around image size, resolution and quality? We don’t want to loose the HD quality of the images when users navigate the gallery (obviously we’ll have to thumbnail them first)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T23:51:47+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:51 pm

    i have read guidelines before (when we still used 1Mbps connections or less) and have been following these until now:

    • high resolution images should not be bigger than 1.5 – 2MB. making it this big is like bigger than the webpage contents itself. try checking http://deviantart.com on how they place big photos in their site and check the image properties using the EXIF if any
    • dimensions should be enough to be viewable in the browser (and avoid scrolling)
    • compression is to be tested. it’s a case to case basis, no setting is the same for everyone. high quality, high compression without visible quality loss is a practice in web design.
    • JPEG is best for images, PNG for the layout and GIF for icons.
    • try loading images in the background when the browser is idle using javascript. that way, they are in the cache before the user knows it.
    • more on the webpage design, avoid using heavy graphics on the site itself, making the site fast so we only wait for the image.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I have a jquery bug and I've been looking for hours now, I can't
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
this is what i have right now Drawing an RSS feed into the php,
I have this code to decode numeric html entities to the UTF8 equivalent character.
I have this code: - (void)parser:(NSXMLParser *)parser foundCDATA:(NSData *)CDATABlock { NSString *someString = [[NSString
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.