Home/ Questions/Q 295873
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-12T06:29:49+00:00

I’m looking to write a Truth Table Generator as a personal project. There are

  • 0

I’m looking to write a Truth Table Generator as a personal project.

There are several web-based online ones here and here.

alt text
(Example screenshot of an existing Truth Table Generator)

I have the following questions:

  • How should I go about parsing expressions like: ((P => Q) & (Q => R)) => (P => R)
  • Should I use a parser generator like ANTLr or YACC, or use straight regular expressions?
  • Once I have the expression parsed, how should I go about generating the truth table? Each section of the expression needs to be divided up into its smallest components and re-built from the left side of the table to the right. How would I evaluate something like that?

Can anyone provide me with tips concerning the parsing of these arbitrary expressions and eventually evaluating the parsed expression?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This sounds like a great personal project. You’ll learn a lot about how the basic parts of a compiler work. I would skip trying to use a parser generator; if this is for your own edification, you’ll learn more by doing it all from scratch.

    The way such systems work is a formalization of how we understand natural languages. If I give you a sentence: “The dog, Rover, ate his food.”, the first thing you do is break it up into words and punctuation. “The”, “SPACE”, “dog”, “COMMA”, “SPACE”, “Rover”, … That’s “tokenizing” or “lexing”.

    The next thing you do is analyze the token stream to see if the sentence is grammatical. The grammar of English is extremely complicated, but this sentence is pretty straightforward. SUBJECT-APPOSITIVE-VERB-OBJECT. This is “parsing”.

    Once you know that the sentence is grammatical, you can then analyze the sentence to actually get meaning out of it. For instance, you can see that there are three parts of this sentence — the subject, the appositive, and the “his” in the object — that all refer to the same entity, namely, the dog. You can figure out that the dog is the thing doing the eating, and the food is the thing being eaten. This is the semantic analysis phase.

    Compilers then have a fourth phase that humans do not, which is they generate code that represents the actions described in the language.

    So, do all that. Start by defining what the tokens of your language are, define a base class Token and a bunch of derived classes for each. (IdentifierToken, OrToken, AndToken, ImpliesToken, RightParenToken…). Then write a method that takes a string and returns an IEnumerable’. That’s your lexer.

    Second, figure out what the grammar of your language is, and write a recursive descent parser that breaks up an IEnumerable into an abstract syntax tree that represents grammatical entities in your language.

    Then write an analyzer that looks at that tree and figures stuff out, like “how many distinct free variables do I have?”

    Then write a code generator that spits out the code necessary to evaluate the truth tables. Spitting IL seems like overkill, but if you wanted to be really buff, you could. It might be easier to let the expression tree library do that for you; you can transform your parse tree into an expression tree, and then turn the expression tree into a delegate, and evaluate the delegate.

    Good luck!

    • 0