Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3691568
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T04:09:45+00:00 2026-05-19T04:09:45+00:00

I’m new to Lucene.NET but I’m using an open source tool built for Sitecore

  • 0

I’m new to Lucene.NET but I’m using an open source tool built for Sitecore CMS that uses Lucene.NET to index lots of content from the CMS. I confirmed yesterday that when I rebuild my indexes, the current index files wipe clean so anything that relies on the index gets no data for about 30-60 seconds (the amount of time for a full index rebuild). Is there a best practice or way to make Lucene.NET not overwrite the current index files until the new index is completely rebuilt? I’m basically thinking I’d like it to write to new temp index files and when the rebuild is done have those files overwrite the current index.

Example of what I’m talking about:

  • Build fresh index (~30 seconds)
  • Index has about 500 documents
  • Use code to access data in index and display on website
  • Rebuild index (~30 seconds)
    • Any code that now reads the index for data returns nothing because the index files are being overwritten; results in website not showing any data
  • Rebuild complete: data now available again, data back on website

Thanks in advance

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T04:09:45+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 4:09 am

    I have no experience with “Sitecore” itself but here’s my story.

    We’ve recently incorporated the index-based search (using Lucene.Net) for our eCommerce sub-system. The index update process for our case might take about half a hour (~50,000 products themselves + lots of related information). To prevent a “denial of service” responses during the update of the index we first create a “backup” version of the it (simply copying index directory to another location) and all further requests are redirected to use this “backup” version. When the index update is completed we delete the backup in order for clients to start using the updated (or “live”) version of the index. This is also helps in case of any unhandled exceptions that might occur during the update process becase you might end up in a situation of having no index at all (and in our case clients can always use the “backup” version).

    The API reference (Lucene 2.4) of the Lucene.Net.Index.IndexWriter object states the following:

    Note that you can open an index with
    create=true even while readers are
    using the index. The old readers will
    continue to search the “point in time”
    snapshot they had opened, and won’t
    see the newly created index until they
    re-open.

    So at least you shouldn’t worry about the clients that are currently searching within your index.

    Hope this will help you to make a right decision.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an ’ in it. SimpleXML turns this
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
Seemingly simple, but I cannot find anything relevant on the web. What is the
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I need to clean up various Word 'smart' characters in user input, including but
I'm looking for suggestions for debugging... If you view this site in Firefox or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.