Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8061353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T10:18:47+00:00 2026-06-05T10:18:47+00:00

I’m new to Scala (from Java) and I like to develop TDD/BDD. So before

  • 0

I’m new to Scala (from Java) and I like to develop TDD/BDD. So before knowing much about Scala I’ve already dived into Scalatest.

I’m wondering what you think is a good access strategy for unit testing, from the viewpoint that you want to test as much as possible.

Suppose I have a class World that I want to test and a class Agent that should not know everything about the World.

package program {
  package world {
    class World {
      private var notForAgent
      def forAgentDuringActing
      // forAgentDuringActing has an important side effect in notForAgent
    } 
  }

  package agent {
    class Agent
    // would call World.forAgentDuringActing
  }

  package world.test {
    class WorldSpec extends FunSpec {
      describe("The world") {
        it("should have side-effect behaviour when the agent acts on it") {
          // ... the test ...
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Note that these package declarations are not sacred to me.
What I really would like, is that WorldSpec would be something like a companion object to World, so that it can test for the side effect.

I thought maybe access modifier qualifiers would help. I could say private[world] notForAgent, but that really is more access than I would like. What I actually would like is something like private[this, test.WorldSpec] notForAgent, but I don’t think multiple qualifiers are allowed.

What would you do to make this testable? Alternatively, can you indicate where my thoughts go in the wrong direction?

p.s. I know the statement “never test privates”. But I also know the opinion “Testing is more important than the code itself. Alter access modifiers if it’s needed for testing”. However, I would like to avoid that discussion in this thread.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T10:18:49+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 10:18 am

    If you’re asking “How to test private methods?”, then ScalaTest actually supports this. See here.

    class C {
      private def m(x: Int) = x
    }
    
    class CTests extends /*any test suite you like*/ with PrivateMethodTester {
      val decoratedM = PrivateMethod[Int]('m)
      val c = new C
      val actual = c invokePrivate decoratedM(4711)
      val expected = 4711
      actual should be(expected) // this line depends on the test suite you've chosen
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For some reason, after submitting a string like this Jack’s Spindle from a text
I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all’Everest What PHP function
I'm new to using the Perl treebuilder module for HTML parsing and can't figure
link Im having trouble converting the html entites into html characters, (&# 8217;) i
That's pretty much it. I'm using Nokogiri to scrape a web page what has
I would like to count the length of a string with PHP. The string
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.